<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<TITLE>Message</TITLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1498" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><SPAN class=318115500-12072005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>I'm
sorta the new FC kid on the block and a little confused. The last version I used
was RH9, very stable. How does FC3 and FC4 compare? Which would be best for a
production server?</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=318115500-12072005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff
size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV>
<DIV><SPAN class=318115500-12072005><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>All
these comments have me on guard :-)</FONT></SPAN></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left><FONT
face=Tahoma size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B>
fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com [mailto:fedora-list-bounces@redhat.com] <B>On
Behalf Of </B>Fred Morcos<BR><B>Sent:</B> Monday, July 11, 2005 8:28
PM<BR><B>To:</B> For users of Fedora Core releases<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re:
WARNING:DO NOT UPGRADE TO CORE 4<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>well, im not against
steven, fc3 is way much better than fc4.. i still experience hell a lot of
problems in fc4 even after upgrading the whole system.. i dont know why all
this happened, is it such bad testing? or the fedora team giving up on the
project?? things/problems that happen aren't suppose to be happening.. i mean,
fedora core 4 till now cant be a usable system anywhere (home, office, server,
etc..)<BR>no offence but i think that fc4 needs a lot more attention for the
next 2 months to get everything tested, fixed and optimized as good as
possible...<BR>im wishing them good luck<BR>-fred<BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>