<a href="http://wordpress.org">wordpress.org</a> WP rocks; easier to set up than Mambo and the php-whatever ones. Also I setup mambo at my hosing company and they said it would require an upgrade since it requires a dedicated server, only runs with certain apache versions, etc. WP is very very light on the other hand, great for blogging and CMS. My site is <a href="http://forensiclug.com">forensiclug.com</a> Marc <div>On 8/10/05, Ezra Nugroho <<a href="mailto:enugroho@spikesource.com">enugroho@spikesource.com</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> There is a great review tools in <a href="http://www.cmsmatrix.org/">http://www.cmsmatrix.org/</a> I think if you are php person, go for Mambo. If you are a perl person go with webgui. On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 20:32 +0530, Manish Kathuria wrote: > Thierry Sayegh wrote: > > Thiago Amaury Ferraz wrote: > > >>Someone knows some good content manager like/else PHP-Nuke? Could say > >>the URL!? I know Typo3, but it is much complex, and the Nuke.. now, it > >>is not so free.. > > > > Have a look at <a href="http://www.opensourcecms.com/">http://www.opensourcecms.com/</a> > > I think it's what you are after in the end > > hth > > Thierry > > > > Can someone suggest a good Content Management System which is > appropriate for a directory of web sites and URLs ? > > Thanks, > > Manish > -- fedora-list mailing list <a href="mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com">fedora-list@redhat.com</a> To unsubscribe: <a href="http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list">http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list </a> </blockquote></div>