Perfect, I can now make a more informed decision. <div>On 10/11/05, Les Mikesell <<a href="mailto:lesmikesell@gmail.com">lesmikesell@gmail.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">On Tue, 2005-10-11 at 15:52, Arthur Pemberton wrote: > Ok thanks for the suggestions. But from someone/people who know, what > are the pros/cons between xorg/vnc/freenx ? I know the later two are > easier done on Windows (which I may need when I am on a foriegn > machine). Freenx will give the best response over low bandwidth or high latency (many hops) connections and isn't bad locally either. Vnc is the most versatile - there is even a palm pilot version and with a little tweak of your X configuration it can grab the live console session which is handy to check remotely on long-running programs. Xorg/Cygwin X are very good over fast local connections and have the least overhead on the server (probably not an issue unless you have a lot of remote GUI users at the same time). -- Les Mikesell <a href="mailto:lesmikesell@gmail.com">lesmikesell@gmail.com</a> -- fedora-list mailing list <a href="mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com">fedora-list@redhat.com </a> To unsubscribe: <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list</a> </blockquote></div> -- As a boy I jumped through Windows, as a man I play with Penguins.