<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.14.0">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 12:02 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">On 09/04/07, Naoki wrote:</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">></FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> Hi all,</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">></FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> Bit of a cosmetic problem here.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">></FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> # rpm -qa selinux-policy-strict</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> selinux-policy-strict-2.4.6-49.fc6</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> selinux-policy-strict-2.2.34-3.fc5</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">></FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">></FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> # rpm -qf /usr/share/selinux/strict/usbmodules.pp</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> selinux-policy-strict-2.4.6-49.fc6</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> selinux-policy-strict-2.2.34-3.fc5</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">></FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">></FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> # rpm -e selinux-policy-strict-2.2.34-3.fc5</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> libsemanage.semanage_direct_remove: Module dpkg was not</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> found.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> semodule: Failed on dpkg!</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> error: %trigger(selinux-policy-strict-2.4.6-49.fc6.noarch)</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> scriptlet failed, exit status 1</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">></FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">></FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> Any idea what is going on there? rpm --rebuilddb didn't help, next option</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">> is a force but I never like those.</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">rpm -e --notriggers --noscripts selinux-policy-strict-2.2.34-3.fc5</FONT>
<FONT COLOR="#000000">might suffice.</FONT>
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
You are correct sir!<BR>
<BR>
# rpm -qa selinux-policy-strict<BR>
selinux-policy-strict-2.4.6-49.fc6<BR>
selinux-policy-strict-2.2.34-3.fc5<BR>
# rpm -e --notriggers --noscripts selinux-policy-strict-2.2.34-3.fc5<BR>
# rpm -qa selinux-policy-strict<BR>
selinux-policy-strict-2.4.6-49.fc6<BR>
<BR>
Now the question is, how did it get itself into that state? I guess the yum update from FC5->FC6 failed to remove the old package because of the scripts error.
</BODY>
</HTML>