You know, I've been wondering why Red Hat hasn't tried to pay royalty for media codecs. I'm pretty sure they have enough money for it... Or mabye there are legal issues with including patented technology with Linux/GNU software? <div>On 4/27/07, Les Mikesell <<a href="mailto:lesmikesell@gmail.com">lesmikesell@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Ric Moore wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Feel better? >>>>> Hurray! I for one will be glad to see the back of it. >>>> How about Noatun?? Can that one be sent to the Bad Place? >>> Yep, ditto for noatun. :) >> I hope xmms doesn't fit in the same fate as those two. > > XMMS rocks, I'd say without hesitation to keep that one! Ric Maybe, except that it lacks mp3 capability in the FCx versions. By the way, there is nothing illegal, immoral, or even fattening about the nvidia module RPM's maintained at <a href="http://rpm.livna.org/">http://rpm.livna.org/</a>. Everyone should know about them. And if you happen to find some other things there that fedora doesn't include after you've added the repository to yum, you didn't hear about that from me. -- Les Mikesell <a href="mailto:lesmikesell@gmail.com">lesmikesell@gmail.com </a> -- fedora-list mailing list <a href="mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com">fedora-list@redhat.com</a> To unsubscribe: <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list </a> </blockquote></div>