are you use a x86_64 cpu? yum list will display 2 packages of firefox, one is the x86_64 version and the another is i386 version. <div>On 7/23/07, don vogt <<a href="mailto:donvogt2001@yahoo.com">donvogt2001@yahoo.com</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> It looks to me like I missed a sign on a turn somewhere. No complaint. Just asking for clarification. I read on Redhat the following. ----------------------------------------------- Firefox <a href="http://2.0.0.5">2.0.0.5</a> Released A new version of the Mozilla products (Firefox, Seamonkey, Thunderbird) were released this week. <a href="http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/known-vulnerabilities.html#firefox2.0.0.5">http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/known-vulnerabilities.html#firefox2.0.0.5 </a> It's rather important you ensure you've installed this update as the browser is certainly the most abused application these days. If you run Fedora, this update has been available via yum for several days. ------------------------------------------------ I have been downloading firefox 2.0 and installing manually to keep up with the latest security fixes. When I do a "yum list firefox I get firefox 1.5. I also did a "yum install firefox" and several yum updates of firefox. I appear to have two versions (copies?) of firefox. Am I wasting my time? Is the fedora build of firefox 1.5 the same as firefox 2.0? (as far as security updates)? -- fedora-list mailing list <a href="mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com">fedora-list@redhat.com</a> To unsubscribe: <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list"> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list</a> </blockquote></div>