<div>On 7/24/07, Gregory Machin <<a href="mailto:gregory.machin@gmail.com">gregory.machin@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Hi I have an fc6 box at hq as router / firewall. I have a cisco route at the remote site, with 2 ip address on the lan interface on in the <a href="http://192.168.199.254/24">192.168.199.254/24</a> and <a href="http://192.168.200.254/24"> 192.168.200.254/24</a> from server <a href="http://192.168.200.240">192.168.200.240</a> i can ping <a href="http://google.com">google.com</a>, but for <a href="http://192.168.199.253">192.168.199.253</a> my tracroute dies on the firewall.. both ip ranges have the same iptables rules an routing .. why would the <a href="http://192.168.199.253">192.168.199.253</a> not be able to access the internet ?? G -- fedora-list mailing list <a href="mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com">fedora-list@redhat.com</a> To unsubscribe: <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list</a> </blockquote> </div> Have you enabled ipforwarding? cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward -- I am convinced that computer viruses are not evil and that programmers have a right to create them, to possess them and to experiment with them . . . truth seekers and wise men have been per- secuted by powerful idiots in every age . . . ́ ' Mark A. Ludwig ------------------------------------------ Allan Swanepoel <a href="mailto:allan@goal.co.za">allan@goal.co.za</a>