<html><p><br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
FThanks</p><p> </p><p>ifconfig was as expected. "route -n" was new to me, so I did it.</p><p>Looks like for the destination 0.0.0.0 (which I believe is outside)</p><p>it was using the 10.0.0.215 machine rather than 192.168.5.15.</p><p>They are both the same machine, but 192.168.5.X network is</p><p>accessible to the outside world.</p><p> </p><p>For the 10.X.X.X interface I removed the entry "10.0.0.215 from default</p><p>gateway which seems to force it to use 192.168.5.</p><p> </p><p>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 4<br>
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 13:21:25 -0700<br>
From: Craig White <craig@tobyhouse.com><br>
Subject: Re: eth0/1<br>
To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list@redhat.com><br>
Message-ID: <1191529285.13452.23.camel@cube.tobyhouse.com><br>
Content-Type: text/plain<br>
<br>
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 19:55 +0000, tony.chamberlain@lemko.com wrote:<br><br>
output of?<br>
<br>
/sbin/ifconfig <br>
/sbin/route -n<br>
cat /etc/resolv.conf<br>
<br>
-<br>
</p></html>