<div>On 10/10/07, Res <<a href="mailto:res@ausics.net">res@ausics.net</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Karl Larsen wrote: > That is a real bunch of words that mean little to me. As for "roll your > own" this takes me back to Red Hat 5. Then you had no choice. But today I > wait for yum update to bring me the one rolled up by the Fedora Experts. I > have had good luck with them. If I want to let a vendor decide what I will and willnot have in a core component of an OS I'll switch to M$ :) and yes I prefere roll your own, I'm not going to ever need 98% of for example the network devices that come configured, conversley I'm not going to watch bluetooth, sound and 60% of the crud they include on a production server, that means theres 60% more security risk</blockquote><div> The vast majority of these things are compiled as modules in the vendor kernels. So, unless you are really tight on disk space I fail to see the validity of your argument. </div> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">-- Cheers Res Slackware -V- sloooUbuntoooou <a href="http://lxer.com/module/newswire/view/93393/"> http://lxer.com/module/newswire/view/93393/</a> -- fedora-list mailing list <a href="mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com">fedora-list@redhat.com</a> To unsubscribe: <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list"> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list</a> </blockquote></div>