<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8"> <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.16.3"> <TITLE>Re: I HATE Evolution ! Thunderbird ?</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 16:34 -0700, Arthur Pemberton wrote: <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE> On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Matthew Saltzman <mjs@clemson.edu> wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 14:12 -0700, Craig White wrote: >>[...] >> still...for exchange server and evolution, I would recommend that you >> set up the Exchange connector instead of IMAP. > > Yes, as bad as the Exchange connector is, my recent experience without > it convinced me that IMAP is ever so much worse. What's wrong with IMAP? </BLOCKQUOTE> Dang! I read this message and found out that I missed 2 email messages since my posting except this one! I discovered that somehow I am not getting these messages through to my email server - delayed? I checked my logs and saw that Craig's message was never logged, but I got Anne's message logged but the message disappeared, Then Arthur's message asking about Kmail version I was referring to (which is 3.5.9), and this was never logged, nor received, followed with Matthew, again no logged nor received and finally I got Arthur which was logged and received. And Finally, I checked my setup and it appears that I am actually using the Exchange connector (or so I think) because instead of selecting IMAP, I chosed Exchange. I wonder if there is some "switching" going on between my 2 email servers as directed by my new split-DNS setup or that my main email server simply dropped the connection for which there is no log - I'll have to dig through the Exchange logs to be certain. Sigh, I have some work cut out for me. Dan </BODY> </HTML>