<div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 12:00 PM, <<a href="mailto:fedora-list-request@redhat.com">fedora-list-request@redhat.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">Send fedora-list mailing list submissions to <a href="mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com">fedora-list@redhat.com</a> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list</a> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to <a href="mailto:fedora-list-request@redhat.com">fedora-list-request@redhat.com</a> You can reach the person managing the list at <a href="mailto:fedora-list-owner@redhat.com">fedora-list-owner@redhat.com</a> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of fedora-list digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: Will btfrs file system obsolete LVM? (Rahul Sundaram) 2. Re: Ideal Swap Partition Size (Aaron Konstam) 3. Samba problem (Paul Smith) 4. Re: ATT's DSL Lite for Linux (g) 5. Re: Ideal Swap Partition Size (Patrick O'Callaghan) 6. Re: gdm - displaying of information/ F10 (Mail Lists) 7. Routing problem - was FC9 Linux gateways, VPN working, IP forwarding isn't (Gary Stainburn) 8. Re: F10+ Burn multiple discs concurrent from iso? (Mikkel L. Ellertson) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:28:08 +0530 From: Rahul Sundaram <<a href="mailto:sundaram@fedoraproject.org">sundaram@fedoraproject.org</a>> Subject: Re: Will btfrs file system obsolete LVM? To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <<a href="mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com">fedora-list@redhat.com</a>> Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:497B2C80.30309@fedoraproject.org">497B2C80.30309@fedoraproject.org</a>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Leslie Satenstein wrote: > My question is in the subject line. > Btrfs will take more time to mature (maybe a couple more releases atleast) but essentially, yes. Btrfs features are listed in <a href="http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page" target="_blank">http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page</a> Rahul ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 09:03:28 -0600 From: Aaron Konstam <<a href="mailto:akonstam@sbcglobal.net">akonstam@sbcglobal.net</a>> Subject: Re: Ideal Swap Partition Size To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <<a href="mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com">fedora-list@redhat.com</a>> Message-ID: <1232809408.3158.25.camel@cyrus> Content-Type: text/plain On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 15:42 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote: > Aaron Konstam wrote: > > > > This is explained in nearly all textbooks on Computer Architecture. So > > the question remains, where is the address space in Linux. > > Patrick isn't the only one confused by your question. I can't make > heads or tails of it. Are you asking where the mapping between the > virtual address space and physical memory is done, or what? > No I am asking where the virtual address space resides of the machine. -- ======================================================================= Pie are not square. Pie are round. Cornbread are square. ======================================================================= Aaron Konstam telephone: (210) 656-0355 e-mail: <a href="mailto:akonstam@sbcglobal.net">akonstam@sbcglobal.net</a> ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:05:22 +0000 From: Paul Smith <<a href="mailto:phhs80@gmail.com">phhs80@gmail.com</a>> Subject: Samba problem To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <<a href="mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com">fedora-list@redhat.com</a>> Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:6ade6f6c0901240705j3880108fo1d7719cd3c078dce@mail.gmail.com">6ade6f6c0901240705j3880108fo1d7719cd3c078dce@mail.gmail.com</a>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Dear All, I could access to a directory in my F10 partition from a VMware virtual machine (MS Windows2000) through Samba, but not now. This is very strange because I have not changed any samba settings. Any ideas? Thanks in advance, Paul ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:31:24 +0000 From: g <<a href="mailto:geleem@bellsouth.net">geleem@bellsouth.net</a>> Subject: Re: ATT's DSL Lite for Linux To: fedora-list <<a href="mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com">fedora-list@redhat.com</a>> Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:497B344C.1040309@bellsouth.net">497B344C.1040309@bellsouth.net</a>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Tim wrote: > A Dlink DIR-300. I'm none-too-impressed with it, for more than just > that reason. it is nice to 'be true to your native country', but some times a simple search on google will help you make up your mind. -- peace out. tc,hago. g . **** in a free world without fences, who needs gates. ** help microsoft stamp out piracy - give linux to a friend today ** to mess up a linux box, you need to work at it; to mess up an ms windows box, you just need to *look at* it. ** learn linux: 'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' <a href="http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html" target="_blank">http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html</a> 'The Linux Documentation Project' <a href="http://www.tldp.org/" target="_blank">http://www.tldp.org/</a> 'LDP HOWTO-index' <a href="http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html" target="_blank">http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/HOWTO-INDEX/index.html</a> 'HowtoForge' <a href="http://howtoforge.com/" target="_blank">http://howtoforge.com/</a> **** -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : <a href="https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20090124/a70977a3/signature.bin" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20090124/a70977a3/signature.bin</a> ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 11:43:42 -0430 From: "Patrick O'Callaghan" <<a href="mailto:pocallaghan@gmail.com">pocallaghan@gmail.com</a>> Subject: Re: Ideal Swap Partition Size To: <a href="mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com">fedora-list@redhat.com</a> Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:1232813622.4044.96.camel@bree.homelinux.com">1232813622.4044.96.camel@bree.homelinux.com</a>> Content-Type: text/plain On Sat, 2009-01-24 at 09:03 -0600, Aaron Konstam wrote: > On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 15:42 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > Aaron Konstam wrote: > > > > > > This is explained in nearly all textbooks on Computer Architecture. So > > > the question remains, where is the address space in Linux. > > > > Patrick isn't the only one confused by your question. I can't make > > heads or tails of it. Are you asking where the mapping between the > > virtual address space and physical memory is done, or what? > > > No I am asking where the virtual address space resides of the machine. No, sorry, nothing coming through. The question as phrased makes no sense. If you're asking where does a given address in the virtual address space map to, it depends on whether the corresponding page of the process address space is currently in RAM, or on backing store (disk or whatever), or nowhere because it hasn't been allocated, but the question "where is the address space" has no meaning. Furthermore, the *machine* as such has no "virtual address space". poc ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 11:29:53 -0500 From: Mail Lists <<a href="mailto:lists@sapience.com">lists@sapience.com</a>> Subject: Re: gdm - displaying of information/ F10 To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <<a href="mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com">fedora-list@redhat.com</a>> Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:497B4201.1080500@sapience.com">497B4201.1080500@sapience.com</a>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 01/24/2009 09:01 AM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 22:50 -0500, Mail Lists wrote: >> Our policy is to minimize information leakage - we recently switched >> from kdm/kde to gdm/gnome and I cannot find how to adjust gdm greeter to >> achieve : > > Dear Mr Lists I did put my name at the bottom. > > Have you considered using kdm with Gnome? Yep, as I said in the original post ++ I did try kdm but there was some nasty white flash before the blue ++ background was loaded as gnome/metacity was started by kdm) This was only on one computer where I ran the test, a lenovo laptop with nvidia graphics. Its a possible workaround for gdm - I am still wondering how to do it with gdm tho'. We are obviously most concerned with laptops rather than desktops. As an aside, we plan to revisit kde periodically to see if its usability and configurabilty are maturing back to kde 3.5 type of levels. Fro the time being we have switched to gnome. Thanks for your suggestion gene/ > > poc > ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 16:40:14 +0000 From: Gary Stainburn <<a href="mailto:gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk">gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk</a>> Subject: Routing problem - was FC9 Linux gateways, VPN working, IP forwarding isn't To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <<a href="mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com">fedora-list@redhat.com</a>> Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:200901241640.15009.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk">200901241640.15009.gary.stainburn@ringways.co.uk</a>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" On Saturday 24 January 2009 11:19:05 Giany wrote: > If you say ip_forward is enabled then either there is a routing problem > or some firewall issue. > I've been going round in circles all day and now my head's spinning. I even got it working once, but don't know how and can't repeat it. Iptables on all four machines set ACCEPT on INPUT, OUTPUT and FORWARD. IP forwarding enabled on both gateways. This only leaves routing. Both gateways talk to each other. Client and Server can talk to their local gateway Local gateway can talk to remote server. Remote gateway cannot talk to client Client cannot talk to remote gateway or server server cannot talk to local gateway or client Layout Client eth0 <a href="http://10.6.1.2/16" target="_blank">10.6.1.2/16</a> Network <a href="http://10.6.0.0/16" target="_blank">10.6.0.0/16</a> Local GW eth0 <a href="http://10.6.1.1/16" target="_blank">10.6.1.1/16</a> eth1 <a href="http://192.168.1.1/24" target="_blank">192.168.1.1/24</a> (internet connection) ppp0 <a href="http://192.168.127.2/32" target="_blank">192.168.127.2/32</a> P-to-P 192.168.127.1 VPN ppp-over-ssh Remote eth0 <a href="http://10.1.1.115/16" target="_blank">10.1.1.115/16</a> GW ppp1 <a href="http://192.168.127.1/32" target="_blank">192.168.127.1/32</a> P-to-P 192.168.127.2 Network <a href="http://10.1.0.0/16" target="_blank">10.1.0.0/16</a> Server eth0 10.1.1.104 route tables Client Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.128.1 10.6.1.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0 192.168.127.1 10.6.1.1 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0 10.6.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 1 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 10.6.1.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 Local Gateway Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.127.1 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp0 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 10.2.0.0 192.168.127.1 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ppp0 136.0.0.0 192.168.127.1 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ppp0 10.1.0.0 192.168.127.1 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ppp0 10.6.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 10.5.0.0 192.168.127.1 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ppp0 172.0.0.0 192.168.127.1 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ppp0 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.254 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1 Remote Gateway Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.127.2 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 ppp1 10.2.0.0 10.1.1.1 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 172.24.0.0 10.1.1.16 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 10.4.0.0 10.1.1.112 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 10.5.0.0 10.1.1.112 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 136.9.0.0 10.1.1.16 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 10.1.1.112 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 Server Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.127.2 10.1.1.115 255.255.255.255 UGH 0 0 0 eth0 10.2.0.0 10.1.1.1 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 172.24.0.0 10.1.1.16 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 10.1.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 10.6.0.0 10.1.1.115 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 10.4.0.0 10.1.1.112 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 10.5.0.0 10.1.1.112 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 136.9.0.0 10.1.1.16 255.255.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 10.1.1.112 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 -- Gary Stainburn This email does not contain private or confidential material as it may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000 ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 10:45:18 -0600 From: "Mikkel L. Ellertson" <<a href="mailto:mikkel@infinity-ltd.com">mikkel@infinity-ltd.com</a>> Subject: Re: F10+ Burn multiple discs concurrent from iso? To: "Community assistance, encouragement, and advice for using Fedora." <<a href="mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com">fedora-list@redhat.com</a>> Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:497B459E.7020503@infinity-ltd.com">497B459E.7020503@infinity-ltd.com</a>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Robin Laing wrote: > Frank Murphy wrote: >> Can any of the fedora supplied, GUI Burners, >> burn multiple copies concurrent. >> Looking at setting up a PC based Duplicator. >> >> Any controller card better than another Fedora POV? >> May 6 devices Internal. >> >> Frank >> > > I think you would be better off using a script and a CLI tool. It isn't > that hard. It may actually work better as each burner, even if > identical will have different properties and operating characteristics. > > But you ask a good question and it will be interesting to see. I suspect that a SCSI controller, and an external LUN controller with the drives in it would work better. I would not want the load of 6 drives burring at the same time on the PC's power supply. Depending on the burn speed, you might run into data transfer problems on the PCI bus in any case. You could run external SATA drives, but the cabling would be a problem and you still have the PCI bus speed limit. Mikkel -- Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for thou art crunchy and taste good with Ketchup! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature Url : <a href="https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20090124/561b043e/signature.bin" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-list/attachments/20090124/561b043e/signature.bin</a> ------------------------------ -- fedora-list mailing list <a href="mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com">fedora-list@redhat.com</a> <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list</a> End of fedora-list Digest, Vol 59, Issue 213 ******************************************** </blockquote></div>