<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40/strict.dtd"><html><head><meta name="qrichtext" content="1" /><style type="text/css">p, li { white-space: pre-wrap; }</style></head><body style=" font-family:'Sans Serif'; font-size:7pt; font-weight:400; font-style:normal;">On Thursday 19 March 2009 00:11:19 Richard England wrote: > Mark Haney wrote: > > Timothy Murphy wrote: > >> I wish some guru who understands NM would bring out a variant > >> that just connects on bootup. > >> I'm pretty sure the standard version would rapidly fall into disuse. > > > > But, they have that feature already. It's the way network interfaces > > have started for a decade. Why bother with NM at all when starting the > > interface on boot is what 99% of people need anyway? > > > > As for the arguments about wireless connectivity, how many people > > actually move between wireless connections? If you do it might be only > > between 2, home and work. > > > > NM sucks, everyone knows it, so let's can it and move to something that > > doesn't. I'll throw my .02 cents in here: NM Rocks ! I can connect to most any wireless connection I come across without issues. It auto connects to remembered SSID's on startup as well. The only area I have issues is with trying to setup VPN access via NM. > > NM works fine for me on my laptop and I regularly move between 4 > different wireless connections. > > It may suck for you but it works great for me. "...so let's can [this > thread] and move to something [else more productive]", eh? > > ~~R </body></html>