<div>On 2/6/06, J. Hartline <<a href="mailto:jasperhartline@adelphia.net">jasperhartline@adelphia.net</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Essien Essien wrote: > Hi all, > > This is my first patch against kadischi. I hope: diff -Naur format is ok? > The attached patch does 3 things: The patch will fail against Kadischi's CVS, for anyone who uses it. Also they are not deployable, you can't explicitly set rhgb, inittab to runlevel 5 or write an xorg.conf file without first checking if: 1) rhgb was installed 2) <a href="http://X.org">X.org</a> was installed Writing out an xorg.conf file based upon installed packages is something Anaconda does during writeXCofniguration(). What would be better is to look into if and why Anaconda is failing to do this with Kadischi. -- Fedora-livecd-list mailing list <a href="mailto:Fedora-livecd-list@redhat.com">Fedora-livecd-list@redhat.com</a> <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-livecd-list </a> </blockquote></div> You're right. Apparently, i patched in the reverse order. Also, after our discussion on #fedora-livecd, it appears that the anaconda.patch for FC4 causes this problem. It would be better to actually fix anaconda.patch for those on FC4. Attached is teh corrected anaconda.patch. This makes 08inittab.sh and 09xorg.sh unneccessary. I'll look into rhgb parameter passing more... i think i have a neat solution for it.