icon cache scriplet guideline update
Ralf Corsepius
rc040203 at freenet.de
Tue Dec 19 19:46:30 UTC 2006
On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 14:02 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Rex Dieter (rdieter at math.unl.edu) said:
> > Yes, intentional. The 'touch' is not needed... that's what
> > 'forceupdate' already does.
>
> How is replacing a call to a binary with a 837 line shell script
> (that will then call the binary) an improvement?
It's called abstraction and encapsulation.
> What actual issues does it solve?
You can exchange anything underneath/inside without having to bother
users nor to touch a spec, again (provided a tool's CLI is stable).
Ralf
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list