Multilib extras packages need i386 libpython2.4.so on x86_64

[Orion Poplawski]

Denis Leroy wrote:
> 
> hmm, I'm not sure i fully understand. Are you requesting anything from 
> the packagers ? k3d simply has a BR: python-devel in its main package. 
> Does it need a specific R: python then ?

I think the question is, "Why isn't i386 libpython2.4.so.1.0 in the 
x86_64 repo?"  The issue has come up before with OpenOffice 
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=151539>

Alternatively, the question is "Why do these packages need 
libpython24.so.1.0  and is that proper?"

-- 
Orion Poplawski
System Administrator                  303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division                    FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane                  orion at cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301              http://www.cora.nwra.com