GPL and LGPL not acceptable for Fedora!
Hans de Goede
j.w.r.degoede at hhs.nl
Thu Aug 16 05:23:23 UTC 2007
Wart wrote:
> Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>> Got your attention? Good.
>>
>> GPL and LGPL are NOT acceptable License tags for Fedora. You cannot
>> simply use "GPL" or "LGPL" as a license tag anymore.
>>
>> You have to use one of the following tags:
>>
>> GPL+, GPLv2, GPLv2+, GPLv3, GPLv3+, LGPLv2, LGPLv2+, LGPLv3, LGPLv3+
>>
>> GPL+: If there is no version specified anywhere, and it only says GPL,
>> then it is GPL+. It is also GPL+ if the code is licensed as "GPL version
>> 1 or later".
>>
>> GPLv2: If the code only says "version 2 of the License." and does NOT
>> say "or later version", then it is GPLv2 only.
>>
> [...]
>>
>> NOTE: Don't trust COPYING. Look at the source code itself.
>
> I've got ~40 packages to go through, so this may take a while. Any
> offers of help are appreciated.
>
Heh, sorry I'm about to finish doing my 149th and 150th package today (after
days of working on this), and I really do _not_ feel like doing any more
license reviews. I'm happy to answer any questions though.
> abe contains only a COPYING file that says 'Version 2', and no copyright
> or license info in the source files themselves. In the absence of
> anything in the source files, does this qualify abe for 'GPL+' or 'GPLv2'?
>
GPL+, the version in the COPYING file is irrelevant.
Regards,
Hans
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list