bugzilla bugs for < fc5 (was Re: Extras Buildsys)
Kevin Fenzi
kevin at tummy.com
Mon Jan 1 20:23:45 UTC 2007
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 11:53:47 -0800
a.badger at gmail.com (Toshio Kuratomi) wrote:
> >
> > Two other end of life issues someone needs to address:
> >
> > - Is someone going to close all the legacy/FE/FC <5 bugs in
> > bugzilla?
> >
> > Looks like there are 77 or so for fe3/fe4.
> > Around 841 in fc1/fc2/fc3/fc4
> > Around 107 in legacy.
> >
> IMHO, it would be best if the package maintainer does this. Look at
> the open bugs on your packages. Decide whether to push them forward,
> close them, or mark them NEEDINFO so that the bug reporter has the
> opportunity to push them forward (like Davej's treatment of kernel
> bugs.)
I suspect that many people won't do so for whatever reason, and we will
be left with bugs where people expect responses and never get them.
Thats just not good IMHO.
I think someone doing a blanket 'This release is no longer supported,
can you retest with fc6 and re-file if it is still an issue' and
closing the bug would be better. All just my opinion. ;)
Also, can someone disable reporting new bugs against those older
releases?
kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-maintainers/attachments/20070101/0899eddb/attachment.sig>
More information about the Fedora-maintainers
mailing list