<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
I can see your frustration now that I think about it. I'm more used to
thinking of "Fedora" as bleeding edge, but you're drawing a line saying
that "Fedora Rawhide" should be the more bleeding edge one and "Fedora
$version_number" being a bit less consistently updated. *throws daggers
at Ubuntu*<br>
<br>
Jesse Keating wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:20080223151622.0deca73b@j2solutions.net"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 12:49:38 -0600
Michael Beckwith <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:michael.d.beckwith@gmail.com"><michael.d.beckwith@gmail.com></a> wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Welcome to the bleeding edge.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
That's the problem. Rawhide is the bleeding edge, not our stable
releases. I've brought this up many times before that we do way too
many updates to our stable releases. Unfortunately I get daggers
thrown at me by the maintainers.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
~Michael
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://ridleytx.structed.net">http://ridleytx.structed.net</a> (for now)
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://michaelbox.net">http://michaelbox.net</a> (eventually) </pre>
</body>
</html>