[Fedora-music-list] Supporting FC4?

[Anthony Green]

On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 18:21 -0700, Anthony Green wrote:
> > FC4 works fine (that's what I'm still using here at CCRMA). It has
> > realtime kernels, patched pam, etc, etc. 
> > 
> > I would rather have things built in Extras for FC4 as well. 
> 
> Good enough for me.  I'll request FC4 branches for my packages tonight.

All of my audio related packages have been built for FC4 Extras: liblo,
swh-plugins, raptor, liblrdf, lash, fluidsynth, dssi and hexter-dssi.

AG