@fedora-devel for the next few weeks

[Karsten Wade]

Personally, I don't relish filling Oisin's shoes these next few weeks.
People have really come to rely upon the summary of life on f-devel-l,
myself included.

I tried to keep up this week, and it's a bit of content.

Can we each pick a thread or two or three?

Summarize those into FWN/Beats/Development?

Here are the threads I see this week:

"Inconsistent package tags"
"Changing default syslog package"
"Fedora Features Process" (also see "Plan for tomorrows...")
"New rpm version about to hit rawhide"
                                   "
Re: Package Updating Doc Available
"portage vs. yum" 
"[RFC] change packaging around shared libraries, ldconfig"
"XULRunner - will be or won't be?"
"Fedora 8's FUDCon"
"Doing away with 'groups' repo in mock"
"RFE: Use generic names in packages "

... and a few others. :)

I'd like to write up on "Fedora Features Process" and maybe "portage vs.
yum".

Anyone want to work on some of the others?

- Karsten
-- 
   Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-news-list/attachments/20070630/aa46679b/attachment.sig>