kernel-2.6.10-1.1074_FC4 breaks firefox?

[Tom London]

On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:45:56 -0500, Stephen Smalley <sds at epoch.ncsc.mil> wrote:
> I'm concerned about the execmod denial on ld.so, not the execmem
> denials.  I think Dan added both to the policy, but we need to remove
> the execmod rule and debug this further, because it seems wrong.
> 
Understand.   I see the execmod rule in base_user_macros.te.

How can I help?

Would it be useful for me to remove the execmod rule for
ld_so_t from there and rerun with audit=1? Something else?

tom

-- 
Tom London