Need testers for Modules policicy on RHEL4

[Daniel J Walsh]

Stephen J. Smoogen wrote:
> On 3/29/06, Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh at redhat.com> wrote:
>   
>> I have back ported the entire selinux tool chain to RHEL4.  I have also
>> attempted to create a modular policy to match RHEL4 policy as closely as
>> possible.
>>
>> These packages are out on
>>
>> ftp://people.redhat.com/dwalsh/SELinux/RHEL4_MODULAR
>>
>> If anyone wants to play with these and do some testing that would be great.
>>     
>
> Cool. I realize there is no promise but I will try them on a test box.
> What should I look for in a test plan? Also what is the difference
> between selinux-policy-2.2.28-1.rhel4.noarch.rpm and
> selinux-policy-targeted-2.2.28-1.rhel4.noarch.rpm?
>
>   
Look for regressions.  Want to make sure RHEL4 works the same under 
both.  The new policy has some added allows but should not have any ones 
missing.  There are some types that have been eliminated but they were 
not used.


>   
>> There is no commitment from Red Hat to ever ship this.  But if it is
>> ever going to ship,
>> we need to find problems with it now.
>>
>> So if you have a spare RHEL4 box and want to play with modular policy,
>> this is your chance.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> --
>> fedora-selinux-list mailing list
>> fedora-selinux-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
>>
>>     
>
>
> --
> Stephen J Smoogen.
> CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
>
> --
> fedora-selinux-list mailing list
> fedora-selinux-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
>