Worrying AVC messages
Daniel J Walsh
dwalsh at redhat.com
Wed Jan 24 21:28:29 UTC 2007
Anne Wilson wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 January 2007 16:52, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>
>> There were two different types of avc in your email. The first
>> concerning postfix should be fixed in the next update. Getting the
>> /dev/video1 to come up properly is the other. Something is wrong in
>> the way you are telling udev to create these devices, unfortunately I
>> have no idea, how to fix.
>>
>>
> /dev/video1 isn't a problem. There's the usual issue of which order the
> video*s are allocated, and I tried to create udev rules to handle this. One
> works, one doesn't.
>
> This works:
>
> KERNEL=="video*", SYSFS{model}=="Pixart PAC207-BCA", SYMLINK+="webcam"
>
> and /dev/webcam points to the correct /dev/video*, whichever one matches the
> model.
>
> This doesn't - the /dev/DC10+ never gets created:
>
> KERNEL=="video*", SUBSYSTEM=="video4linux", SYSFS{name}=="DC10plus_0_",
> SYSFS{dev}=="81:1", SYMLINK+="DC10plus", GROUP="video"
>
> This is a pci capture card. The definintions were taken directly from
> udevinfo.
>
> I've read until my eyes closed, without getting any further with this. I can
> live with the situation, but I'd love to have it really working. I
> appreciate that you are all very busy people, but as I said before, if I can
> help, I will.
>
>
Yes I think you would be better off asking at the fedora-list rather
than here. More people would understand udev there.
> Anne
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> fedora-selinux-list mailing list
> fedora-selinux-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
More information about the fedora-selinux-list
mailing list