"Could not change policy booleans"

[Daniel J Walsh]

Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 14:35 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
>   
>> Stephen Smalley wrote:
>>     
>>> On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 10:00 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Daniel J Walsh wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> Paul Howarth wrote:
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Nils Caspar wrote:
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>> That should have been solved by an update to dbus in fc6 a month ago.
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> What Fedora
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> release are you running? Are you completely updated?
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> I'm running a full updated fedora 7.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> That should have worked. That should be the correct syntax. Was there
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> an avc
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>>>> associated with trying to set this?
>>>>>>>>                 
>>>>>>> There was no other warning.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have the same problem in an other fedora 7 VM. Maybe it's a fedora 7
>>>>>>> bug... :(
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> I've just hit the same problem on a fresh Fedora 7 install, with all 
>>>>>> released updates.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Paul.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> fedora-selinux-list mailing list
>>>>>> fedora-selinux-list at redhat.com
>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
>>>>>>             
>>>>> Does this fix the problem?
>>>>>
>>>>> restorecon -R -v /etc/selinux/targeted
>>>>>           
>>>> No; there are no AVC denials in the audit log (at least not relating to 
>>>> this...) so I don't think it's an SELinux permissions issue.
>>>>
>>>> Updating to the latest selinux package updates from updates-testing 
>>>> hasn't helped either.
>>>>         
>>> Bug in setsebool (it is actually succeeding, but falling through to the
>>> error path and thus incorrectly saying that it failed, as a result of a
>>> "build fix").  Fixed in policycoreutils 2.0.21.
>>>       
>> Ah, saves me having to put something in an initscript :-)
>>
>> FC7 has policycoreutils-2.0.16-5.fc7 (from updates-testing), which seems 
>> a long way behind 2.0.21. Is a fix likely any time soon?
>>     
>
> I sent Dan the patch separately as well, in case he wants to just apply
> it without updating otherwise.
>   
Fixed in policycoreutils 
<https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/policycoreutils>-2.0.16-6.fc7