2.6.24-rc8-mm1 and SELinux MLS - not playing nice....
James Morris
jmorris at namei.org
Fri Jan 18 09:17:00 UTC 2008
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote:
> Posting to both lists because I'm not sure who's at fault here....
>
> System is a Dell Latitude D820, x86_64 kernel, userspace is basically
> Fedora Rawhide as of earlier today, in particular selinux-policy-mls-3.2.5-12.fc9
>
> Trying to boot a 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 kernel gets me these msgs:
>
> security: 5 users, 8 roles, 2043 types, 102 bools, 16 sens, 1024 cats
> security: 67 classes, 164754 rules
> security: class peer not defined in policy
> security: permission recvfrom in class node not defined in policy
> security: permission sendto in class node not defined in policy
> security: permission ingress in class netif not defined in policy
> security: permission egress in class netif not defined in policy
> security: permission forward_in in class packet not found in policy, bad policy
> security: the definition of a class is incorrect
This looks the same as what akpm hit. Paul Moore has updated his labeled
networking patches (see Subject: [RFC PATCH v12 00/18] Labeled networking
changes for 2.6.25), and you could try dropping those into the broken out
-mm in place of the existing git patch, or just wait for a new -mm.
>
> 2.6.24-rc6-mm1 said this instead:
>
> security: class peer not defined in policy
> security: permission recvfrom in class node not defined in policy
> security: permission sendto in class node not defined in policy
> security: permission ingress in class netif not defined in policy
> security: permission egress in class netif not defined in policy
> SELinux: policy loaded with handle_unknown=deny
>
> and then proceeded to work OK.
>
> (I suspect this may be the same thing Andrew Morton hit, but I can't be sure).
>
> Anybody got hints on how to move forward? Or is a fixed policy already in the
> Rawhide pipe?
>
>
--
James Morris
<jmorris at namei.org>
More information about the fedora-selinux-list
mailing list