<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN"> <HTML> <HEAD> <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8"> <META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.3.2"> </HEAD> <BODY> On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 20:09 -0500, Dave Jones wrote: <BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE> <PRE> On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 05:49:17PM -0600, Anthony E. Scandora, Jr. wrote: > There is a fine kernel patch that supports Fedora Core 3 on Microsoft's > Virtual PC at <A HREF="http://vpc.visualwin.com/Notes/FedoraCore.3.Final.html">http://vpc.visualwin.com/Notes/FedoraCore.3.Final.html</A>. I see no kernel patch there. > A > note on the main page of that site says "Installer is very slow, as is > general performance" about Fedora Core 4 Test 1. Does anyone know > 1) Has the kernel patch has moved into the main distribution of Fedora > Core 4? FC3 had the 4g4g patch, FC4 doesn't. That should make a big enough difference that it should 'just work'. Aside from that, nothing specifically for VirtualPC has been included. > 2) Is the slow installer and general performance comment about Core 4 > on Virtual PC vs. Core 3 on Virtual PC, or is that a comment on Core 4 in > general? That's probably the various debugging code thats present right now. In a few days, I'm going to turn it off, and leave it run for a few builds with it off so we can get some performance measurements. Dave </PRE> </BLOCKQUOTE> I installed FC4T1 under an M$ virtual machine just fine yesterday. It worked 'out of the box'. <TABLE CELLSPACING="0" CELLPADDING="0" WIDTH="100%"> <TR> <TD> -- W. Guy Thomas <<A HREF="mailto:mrguytx@austin.rr.com">mrguytx@austin.rr.com</A>> </TD> </TR> </TABLE> </BODY> </HTML>