<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  <title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Jeff Spaleta wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid604aa791050413052849fd8c41@mail.gmail.com"
 type="cite">
  <pre wrap="">On 4/12/05, Mike Bird <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:mgb-fedora@yosemite.net"><mgb-fedora@yosemite.net></a> wrote:
  </pre>
  <blockquote type="cite">
    <pre wrap="">Historically Grub has been unreliable.  [See bugzillas for Fedora,
Debian, GNU, etc, etc.]  If someone tested the latest version of Grub
for six months and found no bugs at all, that would not change the fact
that historically Grub has been notoriously unreliable.
    </pre>
  </blockquote>
</blockquote>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=Red+Hat+Linux&component=lilo&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=CLOSED&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=ASSIGN_TO_PM&bug_status=INVESTIGATE&bug_status=SPEC&bug_status=ON_DEV&bug_status=QA_READY&bug_status=ON_QA&bug_status=PROD_READY&bug_status=FAILS_QA&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=Red+Hat+Linux&component=lilo&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&bug_status=RESOLVED&bug_status=CLOSED&bug_status=NEEDINFO&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=ASSIGN_TO_PM&bug_status=INVESTIGATE&bug_status=SPEC&bug_status=ON_DEV&bug_status=QA_READY&bug_status=ON_QA&bug_status=PROD_READY&bug_status=FAILS_QA&
amp;short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=</a><br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid604aa791050413052849fd8c41@mail.gmail.com"
 type="cite">
  <pre wrap=""><!---->yawn... historically...lilo was removed once before.. in a test
release i think during fc1 testing phase... it came back because there
were SPECIFIC issues that were flagged during testing that convinced
developers to keep lilo in.</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2003-October/msg00945.html">http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2003-October/msg00945.html</a><br>
<br>
or go though the never ending lilo-grub threads.<br>
<br>
-- <br>
shrek-m<br>
</body>
</html>