<div>On 11/21/05, John Reiser <<a href="mailto:jreiser@bitwagon.com">jreiser@bitwagon.com</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> > down side is gnome is scheduled for March 15 2006 > <a href="http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointThirteen">http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointThirteen</a> > > Fedora 5 is scheduled for February 2006 > <a href="http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/schedule/"> http://fedora.redhat.com/participate/schedule/</a> > > > Now I know dates tend to slip, and I would love to see this one slip a > little more ;) And what if GNOME-2.14 slips from its estimated March 15? Getting "coupled" to an external project dramatically increases schedule risk. I want to see Fedora Core 5 keep to the schedule of General Availability at the end of February 2006. If GNOME-2.14 does ship on March 15, then those who want to use it in FC5 can get the updates. -- John Reiser, <a href="mailto:jreiser@BitWagon.com">jreiser@BitWagon.com</a> -- fedora-test-list mailing list <a href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com"> fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a> To unsubscribe: <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list</a> </blockquote></div> Well, honestly I run rawhide all the time and a frequent garnome user so guess I don't really care, it would just be nice to have the latest in the offical release imo, but it really doesn't matter to me.