<div>On 1/15/06, dragoran <<a href="mailto:dragoran@feuerpokemon.de">dragoran@feuerpokemon.de</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Justin Conover wrote: > >> I'm curious how many of the 64 bit os users out there, really need a >> 64bit web browser? >> >> Is there any reason you couldn't live with a 32 bit one? >> >> Can Fedora put firefox.i386 in the x86_64 tree, just like several >> other i386 rpms? >> >> I realize adding it is pretty simple, I've done it for a long time. >> However with processors being realitivly cheap new users are buying >> the amd64 all the time and want to run a 64 bit os. We either turn >> around and tell them, go to <a href="http://mozilla.org">mozilla.org</a> <<a href="http://mozilla.org/">http://mozilla.org/</a> > grab >> the package and install it else were ( can't find fedora bugs ) or cp >> your fedora.repo add i386 through it, and overlap a hole lot of >> packages, "have fun with that".... >> >> I personally use one from <a href="http://mozilla.org">mozilla.org</a> <<a href="http://mozilla.org/">http://mozilla.org/</a>> at the >> moment because I do need things like flash and plugins like that. >> Before you start whining telling me its closed source, my wife is a >> photorgrapher and her website has a lot of flash, I'm sure many of >> you can understand telling your wife no, can't go to your website >> because you used closed source flash would go over like a lead ballon >> ;) And its not just here site, I go to a lot of places that have >> flash and so do a lot of people. > > > Does open source solutions like Swfdec, Gnash and GPLFlash work for > you?. If anyone packages these up, it might be worth checking out. > gnash does not build on x86_64 swfdec has no plugin gplflash keeps crashing firefox --</blockquote><div> Same except I haven't looked at gnash, I saw it in a message to here but didn't look at the e-mail. </div> </div>