<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 1/22/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">CodeHeads</b> <<a href="mailto:ch@code-heads.com">ch@code-heads.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 23:39 -0600, Justin Conover wrote:<br>><br>><br>> On 1/21/06, CodeHeads <<a href="mailto:ch@code-heads.com">ch@code-heads.com</a>> wrote:<br>> On Sat, 2006-01-21 at 22:49 -0600, Justin Conover wrote:
<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > On 1/21/06, CodeHeads <<a href="mailto:ch@code-heads.com">ch@code-heads.com</a>> wrote:<br>> > Just give everyone an update. The CVS worked. At
<br>> first I had<br>> > the wrong<br>> > file, but John E. set me straight, and helping!! LOL<br>> ><br>> > It compiled using the current gcc version with no
<br>> problems.<br>> ><br>> > I am working on a how to for not so knowledgeable<br>> people, like<br>> > me, so<br>> > they can benefit from what I have learned. If anyone
<br>> is<br>> > interested in<br>> > the link let me know. I should have how to done in<br>> an hour or<br>> > less, I<br>> > hope.
<br>> ><br>> > --<br>> > ~WILL~<br>> > Public Key: 0x21715193<br>> > Key: <a href="http://code-heads.com/keys/ch.asc">http://code-heads.com/keys/ch.asc
</a><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)<br>> ><br>> ><br>> iD8DBQBD0wgg5zjngyFxUZMRAlsIAKCN00ySJStTRgCT9V2HQgcaemDBpgCdEFo5
<br>> > UoRqoJ3wqYCWKiwhz3gKLn0=<br>> > =fUh8<br>> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>> ><br>> ><br>> > --<br>
> > fedora-test-list mailing list<br>> > <a href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a><br>> > To unsubscribe:<br>> >
<br>> <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list</a><br>> ><br>> ><br>> ><br>> > Not trying to be a party scruge, but this list is for Fedora
<br>> Core and<br>> > specificaly rawhide. I think with the 30+ e-mail chain on<br>> the last<br>> > one, this should be moved to mailing list like freshrpms or<br>> on the
<br>> > fedora forums.<br>> ><br>> > <a href="http://forums.fedoraforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=21">http://forums.fedoraforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=21</a><br>><br>> UMMM, is this a fedora-test-list???
<br>><br>> Sue me, I was trying to help. So....are you a contributor of<br>> fedora???<br>> --<br>><br>> Not sure what I said deserved this type of reply....<br>><br>> <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate">
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate</a><br>><br>> [WWW]fedora-test-list - For testers of Fedora Core test releases. If<br>> you would like to discuss experiences using Fedora Core TEST releases,<br>> this is the list for you.
<br>><br>> Yes, its the Fedora test list, mplayer is not in fedora core or<br>> extras.<br>><br><br>I was going to take this off list but, since Justin had to be this way,<br>I need to say my peace.<br><br>Ok, so...what about some of the other posts that had nothing to do with
<br>FC, are you going to tell them the same thing???<br><br>Also, the way you said it, it sounds like you are talking down to<br>everyone who posted. That is why I asked if you were a major contributor<br>to fedora. In fact you did not answer it yet.
<br><br>If the post was really harmful to "this" list no one should have<br>answered it then, am i right?? But they did and there was quite a few<br>things solved. I did not see you help out in that thread. So I take it
<br>you are above everyone else.<br><br>I have read some of you posts and you are very short with people. I take<br>it when you were born you knew everything is is to know about<br>linux....and you have an attitude problem, at least that is what I
<br>gather.<br><br>Sorry if I offeneded anyone else on this list. There are quite a few<br>know it alls on this list. I thought this was a big happy community of<br>testers to help the fedora project. I guess that I was a little wrong on
<br>this. :(<br><br>Thanks to those who did help on the problem. I am signing off this list<br>and most likely all the other fedora lists. I will learn on my own, did<br>it once, I will do it again. :)<br><br>Sorry for the blow up, just had to get it off my chest.
<br><br>--<br>~WILL~<br>Public Key: 0x21715193<br>Key: <a href="http://code-heads.com/keys/ch.asc">http://code-heads.com/keys/ch.asc</a><br><br><br>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----<br>Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)<br><br>
iD8DBQBD0yQc5zjngyFxUZMRAqIpAJ9YhyuFH9xjfMJNtYp8Qw0AXzWRGwCdFNID<br>oPeqy9yNiNK1bJsY4nIQpp0=<br>=npie<br>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----<br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>Sorry, didn't realize you took it off the list, gmail isn't as perfect as Google tells us it is ;)
<br><br>Actually I helped you twice:<br><br><a href="http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/34280">http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/34280</a><br><br><a href="http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/34289">
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.testers/34289</a><br><br>And I was trying to help you a third time by suggesting Freshrpms and the FedoraForums were I believe you would get a stronger response and more help.
<br><br>Yes, I have helped Fedora, just like I was trying to help you, but you took it the wrong way apparently by my use of short e-mails since writing a novel in an e-mail about how to do something just isn't on my list of things to do.
<br>