<div>On 1/22/06, Rahul Sundaram <<a href="mailto:sundaram@redhat.com">sundaram@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Robert P. J. Day wrote: >On Sun, 22 Jan 2006, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > > > >>On 1/22/06, gb spam <<a href="mailto:gbofspam@gmail.com">gbofspam@gmail.com</a>> wrote: >> >> >>>We value everything installs, it works for us and jumping through >>>hoops (write web apps; managing kickstart files; using kickstart >>>during installs - does it still not tell you if it can't load the >>>ks file until you get to a point in the install where your options >>>haven't been selected?) is "less convenient" than clicking a check >>>box during install. >>> >>> > > > >>So let me get this straight.. nothing other than a single check box >>during install is going to satify you? There is no room to >>compromise? You've drawn the line in the sand and you are holding >>your breath? That's unfortunate. >> >> > >um ... no. what's unfortunate is your condescending attitude towards >folks who are pointing out that they *like* the concept of an >everything install. that would include folks like *me*, by the way. >does that mean you're going to insult me as well? > > > Can you explain to me a few different use cases which makes it a good argument to be available by default other than selecting package groups, kickstart and using yum . Please explain with rationale instead of just stating your preference. -- Rahul Fedora Bug Triaging - <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers">http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers</a> -- </blockquote></div> The problem is, folks don't want to go through each category and select "everything" they like the simple one click and done option. Me personally, I like the "minimum" check box but thats gone too :)