<pre><tt><tt>As Larry tb indicated, in some other repository he (and I) found a version of the kernel </tt></tt> <tt><tt><tt><tt>kernel-xen-hypervisor-2.6.15-1.2009.4.2_FC5</tt></tt></tt></tt> <tt><tt> That has not been part of the "official Core5 test3" download. I do not know the status of this other kernel, with regards to core5 test3, as no kernel update has ever been distributed since the onset of test3 commencement. On a positive note, I downloaded and tested the latter version and noted two fixes vis a vis the </tt></tt><tt><tt><tt><tt>kernel-xen-hypervisor-2.6.15-1.1955_FC5</tt></tt></tt></tt> <tt><tt> 1) kudzu does not lock up or generate a segfault error and 2) Power-off works (The system actually does a power off) If the latter is not part of what will be unleashed on Monday, the 20th, then my bug is unresolved and is still open. In closing, It has been a furious set of activities to get Core5 test3 to the healthy status it currently is at. I must congratulate </tt></tt><tt><tt>Rahul Sundaram</tt></tt><tt><tt> for a job well done. Many of you do not know that he is often at the keyboard and not in bed at 3am in the morning, so that we can meet the deadline. Further, he had to deal with my ignorance or more specifically my lack of indepth knowledge of how to debug problems. Further, he has never been negative en any correspondence. (A perfect husband or future husband). Leslie Montreal Father, Grandfather, 40 years in system software engineering 11 months with Linux. Message: 8 Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 08:23:21 +0100 From: Larry tb <<a href="Compose?To=guess.who@freesurf.fr&YY=28610&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b">guess.who@freesurf.fr</a>> Subject: Re: kernel and kudzu mismatch (kernel update was not distributed To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases &l! t;<a href="http://us.f302.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=fedora-test-list@redhat.com&YY=28610&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a>> Message-ID: <<a href="Compose?To=4417C0E9.6090309@freesurf.fr&YY=28610&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b">4417C0E9.6090309@freesurf.fr</a>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Well, i m not sure the way i told is the good one .... Sure thing : i have the both hypervisor kernel installed : [root@ws044 ~]# rpm -qa | grep kernel kernel-xen-hypervisor-2.6.15-1.1955_FC5 kernel-xen-hypervisor-2.6.15-1.2009.4.2_FC5 kernel-2.6.15-1.2041_FC5 kernel-2.6.15-1.2038_FC5 kernel-devel-2.6.15-1.2041_FC5 [root@ws044 ~]# Maybe you could try yum install kernel-xen-hypervisor-2.6.15-1.2009.4.2_FC5 ????????? Hmm :( I have just tried to install hypervisor on another machine i have, and cant fi! nd any kernel-xen-hypervisor anywhere . What the hell is it ? Larry tb wrote: > Hi back Leslie :) > Well in fact i use yumex, which is the graphical tool for yum. > I cant believe yumex makes any diffrent from yum, but it seems to :-/ > > > Does it also allow a complete power off of the system after a > shutdown command is issued? > Yes indeed : it complete shuts down ! > > I have just tred to install kernel-xen0 using yum, > #yum update > #yum install kernel-xen0 > and i found it immediatly ! -----> see attanchement please :) > [ok : i didn't installed it, 'cause it will take a loooong time since i > am on pretty old usb box :)] > > Hope it'll help you ! > larry > > Leslie Satenstein wrote: > >> Hi Larry >> >> How is it that via pup you were able to get an updated hypervisor >> (2009.4.2_Fc5, and I have only the version indicated? >> I would like to test the one you use, but have not found how to fetch >> it, or from where. >> Does it also allow a complete power off of the system after a shutdown >> command is issued? >> >> Leslie >> >> >> Message: 4 >> Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 06:32:04 +0100 >> From: Larry tb <<a href="Compose?To=guess.who@freesurf.fr&YY=28610&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b">guess.who@freesurf.fr</a> >> <Compose?To=<a href="Compose?To=guess.who@freesurf.fr&YY=28610&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b">guess.who@freesurf.fr</a>&YY=91764&order=down&sort=date&pos=1&view=a&head=b>> >> >> Subject: Re: KUDZU LOCKUP >> To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases >> <<a href="http://us.f302.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=fedora-test-list@redhat.com&YY=28610&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a> >> <<a href="Compose?To=fedora-test-list@redhat.com&YY=91764&order=down&sort=date&pos=1&view=a&head=b" target="_blank">http://us.f302.mail.yahoo.com/ym/Compose?To=fedora-test-list@redhat.com&YY=91764&order=down&sort=date&pos=1&view=a&head=b</a>>> >> >> Message-ID: <<a href="Compose?To=44165554.4040806@freesurf.fr&YY=28610&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b">44165554.4040806@freesurf.fr</a> >> <Compose?To=<a href="Compose?To=44165554.4040806@freesurf.fr&YY=28610&order=down&sort=date&pos=0&view=a&head=b">44165554.4040806@freesurf.fr</a>&YY=91764&order=down&sort=date&pos=1&view=a&head=b>> >> ! >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed >> >> Actually running kudzu-1.2.34.2-1, and 2.6.15-1.2009.4.2_FC5hypervisor ! >> Have no problem left with kudzu ! >> >> Bretagne, France March the 14th, 2006 - 6.31 am :) >> >> Leslie Satenstein wrote: >> >>> Is there a chance that Kudzu will have a patch to allow it to work >> >> with >> >>> the standard fc5 test3 hypervisor before the files go to generate the >> >> ISO's? >> >>> >>> My system locks up solidly during boot unless I bypass kudzu during >>> boot prompt. In a way, this does not bother me, because I do not >>> anticipate a hardware change for a while. I do intent to do a fresh >>> format install of Core5, and I would want very much that the ISO >> >> version >> >>> of kudzu work. >>> >>> As a reminder*> >> >> >> >>> <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185236" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185236</a> >>> >>> from rpm -qa kudzu-devel-1.2.34.2-1 >>> kudzu-1.2.34.2-1 >>> >>> from uname -r >>> 2.6.15-1.1955_FC5hypervisor >>> >>> The only kernel installed since the test3 iso disks. As of 10pm >> >> Canada Eastern Standard time ! >> >>> (same as >>> New York City), pup tells me that there are zero outstanding patches >> >> are left to install. >> >>> >>> Leslie >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> *** >><b! r>> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Dependencies Resolved > > ============================================================================= > Package Arch Version Repository Size > ============================================================================= > Installing: > kernel-xen0 i686 2.6.15-1.2041_FC5 development 14 M > Installing for dependencies: > bridge-utils i386 1.0.6-1.2 development 27 k > sysfsutils i386 1.3.0-1.2.1 development 64 k > xen i386 3.0.1-4 development 1.3 M > > Transaction Summary > ============================================================================= > Install 4 Package(s)<b! r>> Update 0 Package(s) > Remove 0 Package(s) > Total download size: 16 M > Is this ok [y/N]: n > Exiting on user Command > Complete! > [root@usb-box ~]# > > > </tt></tt></pre>