<html><head><style type="text/css"></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;">I double check the rpm list in /var/log/, it did have the i686 glibc package installed.<br><br><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;">----- Original Message ----<br>From: Jim Cornette <fct-cornette@insight.rr.com><br>To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <fedora-test-list@redhat.com><br>Sent: Sunday, October 29, 2006 11:09:18 AM<br>Subject: Re: new problem with graphical login - FIXED<br><br><div>Mike Chambers wrote:<br>> On Sun, 2006-10-29 at 03:00 -0800, Dwaine Garden wrote:<br>>> I did the same thing and even grabbed the files from the same ftp <br>>> When rpm was updating, there were two script failures, reboot. I'm<br>>> hosed.<br>> <br>> When you all are grabbing the older glibc to reinstall it, are you<br>> grabbing the one for your arch? As in i686 instead of the 386? Don't<br>> know if that is the problem but it might be.<br>> <br><br>The version that bombs after the upgrade is i686. As you noted though, <br>it would not be too difficult to grab the i386 version when downgrading <br>manually with rpm.<br>It sounds possible that the hosed systems might have i386 versions on by <br>mistake.<br><br>Still waiting for a glibc fix since X and sendmail are unhappy with the <br>latest version.<br><br>Jim<br><br>-- <br>Time will end all my troubles, but I don't always approve of Time's methods.<br><br>-- <br>fedora-test-list mailing list<br>fedora-test-list@redhat.com<br>To unsubscribe: <br><a target="_blank" href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list</a><br></div></div><br></div></div></body></html>