<div>On 7/19/07, Jesse Keating <<a href="mailto:jkeating@redhat.com">jkeating@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:36:15 -0500 "Justin Conover" <<a href="mailto:justin.conover@gmail.com">justin.conover@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > [justin@echelon ~]$ uname -a > Linux <a href="http://echelon.whq.sprint.com"> echelon.whq.sprint.com</a> 2.6.20-2925.11.fc7xen #1 SMP Mon Jun 11 > 16:18:59 EDT 2007 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > Is it because I'm on a Xen kernel? hrm, that /shouldn't/ make much of a difference, but I've honestly never tried running pungi like that. I didn't look at the rest, just got concerned when I saw you say x86 on x86_64, and the traceback is common for wrong arch composing. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora -- fedora-test-list mailing list <a href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a> To unsubscribe: <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list </a> </blockquote></div> Well, it is interesting. I booted into the 3228 kernel instead of xen and was able to create F7.i386 cd/dvd/live..... Put I'm clearly on a x86_64 version of fedora :) I'm going to fire off another x86_64 one today at work but wont check on it tell Monday. I might do one at home. I'm trying to enable updates-testing too now.