Very good, today I was searching the maintainer of initscripts. Suggestion: "Component Information" instead "Maintainer Information" What you think? Nice work. Regards, - - iarly selbir | ski0s :wq! <div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Adam Williamson <<a href="mailto:awilliam@redhat.com">awilliam@redhat.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"> Hi, guys. I just made a revision to the Components and Triagers page in the bugzappers wiki: <a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/Components_and_Triagers" target="_blank">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/Components_and_Triagers</a> it now contains a column named 'Maintainer information' which links (with one exception) to the fedora package database page for the main package in the component, so you can conveniently find out who is the maintainer for each component. The exception is KDE - that link goes to the KDE SIG page. Does this seem sensible? Any complaints? :) Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org <a href="http://www.happyassassin.net" target="_blank">http://www.happyassassin.net</a> -- fedora-test-list mailing list <a href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a> To unsubscribe: <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list</a> </blockquote></div>