Greetings: Whenever I update beta Live CD, Snapshot 1 Live CD, or fc10 to full update, I lose my wifi... Packages are: 1) kernel-2.6.29.1-70 2) NetworkManager*-0.7.1 3) zd1211-firmware-1.4-2 It was working when kernel-2.6.29.1-56 was installed. Can anybody help me or tell me what to do to possible fix it? My real e-mail address is: <a href="mailto:robhealey1@gmail.com">robhealey1@gmail.com</a> Sincerely, Rob <div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:05 PM, <<a href="mailto:fedora-test-list-request@redhat.com">fedora-test-list-request@redhat.com</a>> wrote: <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Send fedora-test-list mailing list submissions to <a href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list</a> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to <a href="mailto:fedora-test-list-request@redhat.com">fedora-test-list-request@redhat.com</a> You can reach the person managing the list at <a href="mailto:fedora-test-list-owner@redhat.com">fedora-test-list-owner@redhat.com</a> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of fedora-test-list digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: video playback issues with kdenlive on Fedora 11 beta (Christopher Beland) 2. grub splash image busted? (Tom Horsley) 3. Re: network question (Kevin Kofler) 4. Re: grub splash image busted? (Kevin Kofler) 5. Re: grub splash image busted? (Robert L Cochran) 6. Flash on Rawhide (Brian Vuyk) 7. Re:Smolt question (Arne Chr. Jorgensen) 8. Re: grub splash image busted? (Tom Horsley) 9. Re: grub splash image busted? (Greg) 10. Wifi (Arne Chr. Jorgensen) 11. Re: how to install adobe flashplayer in fedora 10 86_64 (Antonio Olivares) 12. Re: how to install adobe flashplayer in fedora 10 86_64 (Greg) 13. Re: Re: Fedora-10 nightmare-5 (Leslie) 14. About Workspace (Angel Fish) 15. Audio in virtual machines (Jason) 16. Add/Remove Software no progress display (Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 20:52:18 -0400 From: Christopher Beland <<a href="mailto:beland@alum.mit.edu">beland@alum.mit.edu</a>> Subject: Re: video playback issues with kdenlive on Fedora 11 beta To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <<a href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a>> Message-ID: <1240015938.2589.40.camel@diet-anarchy.localdomain> Content-Type: text/plain You may want to file a report at <a href="http://bugzilla.redhat.com" target="_blank">bugzilla.redhat.com</a>, lest the details get lost in the traffic of the mailing list. -B. On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 23:28 +0100, Andrew Smith wrote: > On 16/04/09 23:07, Andrew Smith wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > I'm currently testing Fedora 11 beta x86_64. > > > > I'm specifically testing kdenlive (non-linear video editor) before > > Fedora 11 is released. > > > > The first install went great, with kdenlive absolutely stable and the > > whole system extremely fast on ext4 (I'm amazed how much faster > > everything is to be honest!) > > > > All was good for a day or two and then I did a full yum update to the > > system. > > > > On the next start up of kdenlive any attempt to render any video plays > > for a second or two and then freezes. > > I have directly tested inigo and ffplay and both also freeze up. > > > > If I play back the same video file with vlc it plays perfectly. > > > > I do not know what specific package versions I was on but I do recall > > seeing qt being upgraded in the yum update. > > Also some xorg and x11 packages. > > > > The rest of the GUI in kdenlive is still responsive, so it looks like > > it's just the render thread that's frozen. > > > > Cheers, > > Andrew > > > After a bit of testing I've found the problem: > > kernel-2.6.29.1-70.fc11.x86_64 = video freezes up after a few seconds > > kernel-2.6.29.1-68.fc11.x86_64 = OK > kernel-2.6.29-0.258.2.3.rc8.git2.fc11.x86_64 = OK > > Therefore the solution is just to change grub.conf to boot off > kernel-2.6.29.1-68.fc11.x86_64 for now. > > So far running Fedora 11 beta using ext4 is lightning fast and stable - > thanks to all the developers it's look great! > > Andrew > > Send instant messages to your online friends <a href="http://au.messenger.yahoo.com" target="_blank">http://au.messenger.yahoo.com</a> > ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:46:44 -0400 From: Tom Horsley <<a href="mailto:tom.horsley@att.net">tom.horsley@att.net</a>> Subject: grub splash image busted? To: fedora-test-list <<a href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a>> Message-ID: <20090417214644.2ecc5bb0@zooty> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII The latest rawhide /boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz file shows up looking like a bad swatch of carpet with vomit stains when grub tries to display it :-). I thought splash images were restricted to 14 colors (or some number around there), this image has 255 colors according to identify (ImageMagick command). ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:47:30 +0200 From: Kevin Kofler <<a href="mailto:kevin.kofler@chello.at">kevin.kofler@chello.at</a>> Subject: Re: network question To: <a href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a> Message-ID: <gsbbfi$der$<a href="mailto:1@ger.gmane.org">1@ger.gmane.org</a>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Arne Chr. Jorgensen wrote: > Received from HP: Virus Threat Conficker > > Does this virus affect Linux ? No. Kevin Kofler ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:50:18 +0200 From: Kevin Kofler <<a href="mailto:kevin.kofler@chello.at">kevin.kofler@chello.at</a>> Subject: Re: grub splash image busted? To: <a href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a> Message-ID: <gsbbkq$der$<a href="mailto:2@ger.gmane.org">2@ger.gmane.org</a>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Tom Horsley wrote: > The latest rawhide /boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz file shows up > looking like a bad swatch of carpet with vomit stains when > grub tries to display it :-). <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496202" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496202</a> Kevin Kofler ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:57:32 -0400 From: Robert L Cochran <<a href="mailto:cochranb@speakeasy.net">cochranb@speakeasy.net</a>> Subject: Re: grub splash image busted? To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <<a href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a>> Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:49E9338C.4010706@speakeasy.net">49E9338C.4010706@speakeasy.net</a>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Yep, it looks like a rainbow colored puddle of some substance or other. Bob On 04/17/2009 09:46 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: > The latest rawhide /boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz file shows up > looking like a bad swatch of carpet with vomit stains when > grub tries to display it :-). > > I thought splash images were restricted to 14 colors (or > some number around there), this image has 255 colors according > to identify (ImageMagick command). > > ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:00:51 -0400 From: Brian Vuyk <<a href="mailto:brian@brianvuyk.com">brian@brianvuyk.com</a>> Subject: Flash on Rawhide To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <<a href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a>> Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:49E93453.7050807@brianvuyk.com">49E93453.7050807@brianvuyk.com</a>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed I've been having some minor issues with the proprietary Flash on Rawhide (32-bit). It seems that whenever I make a flash file fullscreen, Firefox crashes. When running it through GDB, I get the following printed out just prior to the backtrace starting: *** glibc detected *** /usr/lib/firefox-3.1b3/firefox: free(): invalid pointer: 0xa4958b00 *** Is this possibly related to the recent malloc changes in glibc? I would like to get a sense of how many people are experiencing the same crash. From conversation with others in #fedora-qa, it seems to be pretty widespread. It can be easily tested by visiting any video site (youtube, megavideo etc.), opening a video, and clicking the 'enlarge' or 'fullscreen' button. I should note that I used this same version of Flash (10.0.22.87) with no fulllscreen issues on Ubuntu prior to beginning to test Rawhide. There is an existing bug in bugzilla about it, to which I've added my information. However, it doesn't seem to be drawing a lot of attention, and I think this is a fairly important bug to be quashed, since so many people use the proprietary flash. Here is the bugzilla link: <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477110" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477110</a> Brian ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:08:03 -0700 (PDT) From: "Arne Chr. Jorgensen" <<a href="mailto:achrisjo@yahoo.com">achrisjo@yahoo.com</a>> Subject: Re:Smolt question To: <a href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a> Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:584420.16638.qm@web63707.mail.re1.yahoo.com">584420.16638.qm@web63707.mail.re1.yahoo.com</a>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Jerry Amundson wrote: > > Message: 3 > Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:37:04 -0500 > From: Jerry Amundson <<a href="mailto:jamundso@gmail.com">jamundso@gmail.com</a>> > Subject: Re: Smolt question > To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases > <<a href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a>> > Message-ID: > <<a href="mailto:6d06ce20904171237r5e659f1an898dc5321576d6fe@mail.gmail.com">6d06ce20904171237r5e659f1an898dc5321576d6fe@mail.gmail.com</a>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:28 PM, Arne Chr. Jorgensen > > <<a href="mailto:achrisjo@yahoo.com">achrisjo@yahoo.com</a>> > wrote: > > > > hi, > > > > Some has asked about my hardware, and I thought I could use smolt. > > Opening in Gnome, the UUID is ...shoot, have to copy it by hand: > > > > UUID 35a83161-913c-412f-91a8-e64bbd096c42 > > > > If I try "My Smolt Page" - firefox is loading forever, and I can not > > access it. > > > > I just wondered if any of you could try the number above. Someone here > > included their hardware in a link, which worked. I don't know why I am > > not able to do that. > > smoltSendProfile --help > for example > smoltSendProfile -a > > will show the url when it complete. > > jerry Thank you: Did "smoltSendProfile -a Using the information on the bottom, gave " Error: Critical: New versions of smolt use a public UUID. Yours is: pub_165cffbb-6c02-46d3-84e5-f81db90bcd53" Using this new number, gave a page. If this is accessable by others, I have no idea. Perhaps some admin settings would be needed. Using the admin password given, gave another "Error: Critical...." but I don't have any other then the one supplied. The graphical smolt-app is clearly failty. //ARNE ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:12:04 -0400 From: Tom Horsley <<a href="mailto:tom.horsley@att.net">tom.horsley@att.net</a>> Subject: Re: grub splash image busted? To: <a href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a> Message-ID: <20090417221204.345be888@zooty> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII On Sat, 18 Apr 2009 03:50:18 +0200 Kevin Kofler wrote: > <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496202" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=496202</a> That's the trouble with closing bugs as soon as they are fixed, you don't find them when you search open bugs :-). ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 12:22:10 +1000 From: Greg <<a href="mailto:Samba30i@aim.com">Samba30i@aim.com</a>> Subject: Re: grub splash image busted? To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <<a href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a>> Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:49E93952.6060101@aim.com">49E93952.6060101@aim.com</a>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed On 18/04/2009 11:57 AM, Robert L Cochran wrote: > Yep, it looks like a rainbow colored puddle of some substance or other. > > Bob > > > On 04/17/2009 09:46 PM, Tom Horsley wrote: >> The latest rawhide /boot/grub/splash.xpm.gz file shows up >> looking like a bad swatch of carpet with vomit stains when >> grub tries to display it :-). >> >> I thought splash images were restricted to 14 colors (or >> some number around there), this image has 255 colors according >> to identify (ImageMagick command). >> > > -- > fedora-test-list mailing list > <a href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a> > To unsubscribe: <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list</a> i believe the fix is in koji now *fedora-logos* <a href="http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=98376" target="_blank">http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=98376</a> .im sure thats the fix thats needed which should be pushed to rawhide soon i would assume ------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:30:24 -0700 (PDT) From: "Arne Chr. Jorgensen" <<a href="mailto:achrisjo@yahoo.com">achrisjo@yahoo.com</a>> Subject: Wifi To: <a href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a> Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:562922.73174.qm@web63702.mail.re1.yahoo.com">562922.73174.qm@web63702.mail.re1.yahoo.com</a>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii hi, The last composed email was done with CPU-scaling 800 MHz, cable connected, and this time "send" did work. It is behaving differently then on Wifi. Closing a tab in Firefox, froze up the computer. Tried everything to kill the application. ( sure would like a kill-application as under TWM ! ) Nothing worked, accept power off button. But this scaling issue looks like nonsense: - it should behave like a similar cpu with lower crystal frequency. It should not depend on application you are running. Either my understanding is wrong, or here are some serious faults. Some of the sticky response, stealing of mouse, is back when running on cable. ( I need to recheck it at 2GHz, just to tired of all the problems for one day ) //ARNE ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:55:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Antonio Olivares <<a href="mailto:olivares14031@yahoo.com">olivares14031@yahoo.com</a>> Subject: Re: how to install adobe flashplayer in fedora 10 86_64 To: Nathan Huang <<a href="mailto:nathan.vorbei.tech@gmail.com">nathan.vorbei.tech@gmail.com</a>> Cc: <a href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a> Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:7242.83651.qm@web52603.mail.re2.yahoo.com">7242.83651.qm@web52603.mail.re2.yahoo.com</a>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii --- On Fri, 4/17/09, Nathan Huang <<a href="mailto:nathan.vorbei.tech@gmail.com">nathan.vorbei.tech@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > From: Nathan Huang <<a href="mailto:nathan.vorbei.tech@gmail.com">nathan.vorbei.tech@gmail.com</a>> > Subject: how to install adobe flashplayer in fedora 10 86_64 > To: <a href="mailto:fedora-list@redhat.com">fedora-list@redhat.com</a> > Date: Friday, April 17, 2009, 7:48 PM > Hi guys > I met a serious problem with installing adobe flashplayer > in 86_64 fedora 10. I find adobe company just provide the > flashplayer for i386. is there some flashplayer can be > supported by 86_64? > thanks in advance > nathan > > -- fedora-list mailing list Nathan, Mike summed it up very nicely <quote> <a href="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashplayer10/libflashplayer-10.0.22.87.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz" target="_blank">http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashplayer10/libflashplayer-10.0.22.87.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz</a> You don't have to install or remove anything at all except the above package. 1 - Just download it from above (as that should be the most updated one, and yes it's beta, not official release yet). 2 - untar the package above from the location it's in. 3 - copy the extracted .so file to /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/ dir. 4 - Start firefox and your all set. -- Mike Chambers Madisonville, KY Fedora Project - Bugzapper, Tester, User, etc.. <a href="mailto:miketc302@fedoraproject.org">miketc302@fedoraproject.org</a> </quote> He was replying to the thread: <a href="http://www.nabble.com/what-*is*-the-proper-recipe-for-64-bit-flash-support--to22850009.html#a22852706" target="_blank">http://www.nabble.com/what-*is*-the-proper-recipe-for-64-bit-flash-support--to22850009.html#a22852706</a> HTH, Antonio ------------------------------ Message: 12 Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 13:22:50 +1000 From: Greg <<a href="mailto:Samba30i@aim.com">Samba30i@aim.com</a>> Subject: Re: how to install adobe flashplayer in fedora 10 86_64 To: <a href="mailto:olivares14031@yahoo.com">olivares14031@yahoo.com</a>, For testers of Fedora Core development releases <<a href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a>> Cc: Nathan Huang <<a href="mailto:nathan.vorbei.tech@gmail.com">nathan.vorbei.tech@gmail.com</a>> Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:49E9478A.6080605@aim.com">49E9478A.6080605@aim.com</a>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" On 18/04/2009 12:55 PM, Antonio Olivares wrote: > > > --- On Fri, 4/17/09, Nathan Huang<<a href="mailto:nathan.vorbei.tech@gmail.com">nathan.vorbei.tech@gmail.com</a>> wrote: > > >> > From: Nathan Huang<<a href="mailto:nathan.vorbei.tech@gmail.com">nathan.vorbei.tech@gmail.com</a>> >> > Subject: how to install adobe flashplayer in fedora 10 86_64 >> > <a href="mailto:To%3Afedora-list@redhat.com">To:fedora-list@redhat.com</a> >> > Date: Friday, April 17, 2009, 7:48 PM >> > Hi guys >> > I met a serious problem with installing adobe flashplayer >> > in 86_64 fedora 10. I find adobe company just provide the >> > flashplayer for i386. is there some flashplayer can be >> > supported by 86_64? >> > thanks in advance >> > nathan >> > >> > -- fedora-list mailing list >> > Nathan, > > Mike summed it up very nicely > > <quote> > <a href="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashplayer10/libflashplayer-10.0.22.87.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz" target="_blank">http://download.macromedia.com/pub/labs/flashplayer10/libflashplayer-10.0.22.87.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz</a> > > You don't have to install or remove anything at all except the above > package. > > 1 - Just download it from above (as that should be the most updated one, > and yes it's beta, not official release yet). > > 2 - untar the package above from the location it's in. > > 3 - copy the extracted .so file to/usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/ dir. > > 4 - Start firefox and your all set. > > -- Mike Chambers Madisonville, KY Fedora Project - Bugzapper, Tester, > User, etc.. <a href="mailto:miketc302@fedoraproject.org">miketc302@fedoraproject.org</a> </quote> He was replying to > the thread: > <a href="http://www.nabble.com/what-*is*-the-proper-recipe-for-64-bit-flash-support--to22850009.html#a22852706" target="_blank">http://www.nabble.com/what-*is*-the-proper-recipe-for-64-bit-flash-support--to22850009.html#a22852706</a> > HTH, Antonio _leigh123@linux_ within the fedoraforum has made a RPM which is in his thread <a href="http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=205642&highlight=64bit+flash" target="_blank">http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=205642&highlight=64bit+flash</a> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <a href="https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20090418/89d8c28a/attachment.html" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20090418/89d8c28a/attachment.html</a> ------------------------------ Message: 13 Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:39:26 -0400 From: Leslie <<a href="mailto:leslie.satenstein@gmail.com">leslie.satenstein@gmail.com</a>> Subject: Re: Re: Fedora-10 nightmare-5 To: For testers of Fedora Core development releases <<a href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a>> Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:49E94B6E.4060108@gmail.com">49E94B6E.4060108@gmail.com</a>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 12:10 +0200, François Cami wrote: > >> On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 01:02:20 -0700 (PDT) >> "Arne Chr. Jorgensen" <<a href="mailto:achrisjo@yahoo.com">achrisjo@yahoo.com</a>> wrote: >> >> >>> I would be very pleased >>> in anyone would bother to mention the issue to Xorg, and such, as it is >>> I think it clear where the error may be located. I have worked around >>> the clock, and it is such a painstaking thing to just write anything at >>> all on this machine on the momenent. I would appreachiate if some passed >>> this to those that could be able to look into the code. >>> >> Arne, >> >> I realize you're on F10, but the workarounds (nomodeset in the kernel >> command line, and switching to XAA in xorg.conf) mentioned in the rawhide >> bug <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495454" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495454</a> may help you. >> >> Alternatively, I would suggest trying F11 as soon as Preview is out and >> reporting any bug at <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/</a> . >> > > And to isolate whether the issue actually is the X driver, you could try > using the vesa driver instead (or even radeonhd, if the hardware is new > enough to work with it). Just to test. > I cant understand the problem. I have a hdradeon 3450 (256meg) card, and everything works just fine at higher resolutions above 1024x768. I have not tested lower resolutions, but expect that there may be some problems at the 800x600 level. (Just surmising). My driver is fglrx (vendor supplied) ------------------------------ Message: 14 Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:05:59 -0400 From: Angel Fish <<a href="mailto:dolphinysj@gmail.com">dolphinysj@gmail.com</a>> Subject: About Workspace To: <a href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a> Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:fc260d630904172105v346c1091pcc836f93ddc89e0b@mail.gmail.com">fc260d630904172105v346c1091pcc836f93ddc89e0b@mail.gmail.com</a>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hello everyone, When I opening the firefox in Workspace1, then turn to Workspace2 and open the Terminal. While the Terminal is opening, turn back to Workspace1. As a result, Terminal is opened in Workspace1 only. It's the first time I use Fedora 10(also Linux), so I am not sure whether it's a bug or not. Do someone meet the same scene? PS:The Fedora is running on the Sun VirtualBox. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <a href="https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20090418/f92ca56c/attachment.html" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/attachments/20090418/f92ca56c/attachment.html</a> ------------------------------ Message: 15 Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2009 00:51:44 -0400 From: Jason <<a href="mailto:monty19@hotmail.com">monty19@hotmail.com</a>> Subject: Audio in virtual machines To: <a href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a> Message-ID: <BAY125-DAV13057040D58716CC332935A6780@phx.gbl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Has anyone been able to get audio working in a fully updated Fedora 11 Beta virtual machine guest? I have tried on vmware server 2.0 (win vista and rhel 5.3 hosts), vmware fusion 2.0.4 (10.5 host), virtualbox 2.2.0, and parallels desktop 4.0. The furthest I get working audio is doing a clean installation of a Fedora 11 Beta guest. As soon as the kernel and pulseaudio are updated everything stops working; sound skips and hangs... nothing works. Fully updating a system doesn't resolve the problem. I did file a bug in bugzilla regarding my experience with the vmware products, however it was closed... twice. I have since gone on to try virtualbox and parallels with similar results. I won't have a chance to try a kvm guest until tomorrow at the earliest. Simply updating pulseaudio on a cleanly installed F11 Beta system (i.e. yum -y update pulseaudio) doesn't seem enough to break the system, although doing an update of pulseaudio and the kernel does (yum -y update pulseaudio kernel) Either booting the original kernel, or removing pulseaudio fixes the playback however removing pulseaudio isn't really an option anymore because it breaks the new volume control applet, with the old gnome volume control applet deprecated, not to mention it is impossible to configure any audio options with the graphical tools at that point either. The bug I filed is here: <a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494747" target="_blank">https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=494747</a> ------------------------------ Message: 16 Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 23:04:35 -0700 From: Chuck Forsberg WA7KGX N2469R <<a href="mailto:caf@omen.com">caf@omen.com</a>> Subject: Add/Remove Software no progress display To: Fedora Test List <<a href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a>> Message-ID: <<a href="mailto:49E96D73.5090003@omen.com">49E96D73.5090003@omen.com</a>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Today's Rawhide installs but the add/remove software app no longer shows the progress of which files are being worked on. -- Chuck Forsberg <a href="mailto:caf@omen.com">caf@omen.com</a> <a href="http://www.omen.com" target="_blank">www.omen.com</a> 503-614-0430 Developer of Industrial ZMODEM(Tm) for Embedded Applications Omen Technology Inc "The High Reliability Software" 10255 NW Old Cornelius Pass Portland OR 97231 FAX 629-0665 ------------------------------ -- fedora-test-list mailing list <a href="mailto:fedora-test-list@redhat.com">fedora-test-list@redhat.com</a> <a href="https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list" target="_blank">https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-test-list</a> End of fedora-test-list Digest, Vol 62, Issue 101 ************************************************* </blockquote></div>