Dear Robert First of all, I've had the same questions and problems as you have now. This style of none documentation by the fedora team is just a shame for the whole open source community! Probably Jeremy Katz is too busy by meeting his new board members friends, so that he has no more time to write just a little documentation with explanations, not just a unusable mini mini howto. What the big problem is behind the FC5 and Xen implementation is, that the xen guys at fedora have no idea what SELinux is doing. So, finally they made an implementation of xen and SELinux that is not usable. If you don't want to spend two weeks configuring your SELinux, you have to decide, if you use in future SELinux or Xen (By the way, the same issues you have with httpd and SELinux). So my personal proposal is, that you just disable SELinux wherever you find it on your FC5 installation. After disabling SELinux (you have to reboot so that everything works fine, => Oh I like this old nice M$ Win95 style of system management) you can use your xen config as you posted in your mail. With the xenguest-install.py script you can't install FC4 or another distribution, because the FC5 guys made an adaptation of the anaconda system installer. By the way, this is a nice feature, because you can now kickstart your FC5 installation. If you want to install a new non FC5 guest, do it in the old style. Create your devices with LVM and perform a yum groupinstall with --installdir=yourdevice. As you can see, Fedora Core 5 is a typical example for bad IT Management. They tried to do a lot of thing in a short time. So several teams worked on different things and now, nothing really fits together. The whole implementation of the SELinux is a disaster. So for professional use, you have to go back to Fedora Core 4. Also because the oracle stuff is not working with the new glibc (it's not possible to start the listener... :-(). I by myself have to use FC5, because I need to kickstart my xen installation and need apache 2.2. If you don't need those features, use CentOS or the original RHES. Hope I gave you the right hints. bye Philipp =============================================== Philipp Jäggi SNCT Sandweiler bp 23 L-5230 Sandweiler +352 35'72'14'342 <table width=100%> <tr valign=top> <td width=40%>"Robert Mortimer" <rmortimer@bluechiptechnology.co.uk> Sent by: fedora-xen-bounces@redhat.com 04/18/2006 04:22 PM <td width=59%> <table width=100%> <tr valign=top> <td> <div align=right>To</div> <td><fedora-xen@redhat.com> <tr valign=top> <td> <div align=right>cc</div> <td> <tr valign=top> <td> <div align=right>Subject</div> <td>[Fedora-xen] Running FC4 on FC5</table> <table> <tr valign=top> <td> <td></table> </table> <tt>I am attempting to run an FC4 image on an FC5 machine I have prepped the image as per the FC4 quick start my xen config is as follows kernel ="/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.13-1.1532_FC4xenU" memory = 100 name = "vm01" vcpus = 1 vif= ['mac=FE:FD:25:63:74:49'] disk = [ 'file:/root/VM/fedora.img,sda1,w' ] root = "/dev/sda1" extra = "ro selinux=0 3" All I get is # xm create vm01 Using config file "vm01". Error: Error creating domain: (22, 'Invalid argument') Has anyone got a simple 1 NIC guest config for FC4 on FC5 I see that the new FC5 uses An init image as part of the boot A python based boot loader and a python based install script Is there any way to hack this lot to do an install like the FC5/FC5 one? How are the init images built? Will the new installer do other guest OS's in the future? Robert -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen </tt>