[Freeipa-devel] [RFC] IPA "firstboot" UI

Simo Sorce ssorce at redhat.com
Tue Jan 29 15:36:16 UTC 2008


On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 09:59 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> Simo Sorce wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-01-29 at 09:49 -0500, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> >> Simo, should we switch the instance naming to slapd-IPA from
> >> slapd-REALM 
> >> and stop removing all existing instances (except perhaps, for ours)?
> > 
> > Not sure, I don't think we really want to keep other instances around,
> > how they are going to interact ?
> > Is there going to be auth problems after we install ?
> > Can there be conflicts somehow (same base dn) ?
> > 
> 
> The other instance(s) will be running on different ports (or not at all) 
> so it really shouldn't matter.
> 
> They don't need to interact at all, but who are we to say that nobody 
> can have other instances of a product. If it interferes with IPA then 
> that's their problem.

I see the reasoning, can we discuss this a bit further next time we have
a conf call or meeting ?

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York




More information about the Freeipa-devel mailing list