[Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] Make NSS responded less picky about missing attributes

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at redhat.com
Tue Mar 10 18:54:03 UTC 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 14:43 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 12:54 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>>> Simo Sorce wrote:
>>>>> This should solve the disconnect Steve found with sysdb interfaces and
>>>>> NSS Responder expectations.
>>>>>
>>>> One issue. I thought our plan was that on initial user creation we were
>>>> going to populate both GECOS and FULLNAME with the fullname, and then
>>>> clients of the InfoPipe or commandline tools could change the values
>>>> individually.
>>> Yes but I think we should do this in the Infopipe.
>>> For pure CLI clients the fullname is not a visible field so I don't
>>> think it make sense to fill it.
>>>
>>> Simo.
>>>
>> My primary concern here then is to make sure that both of those fields
>> are exposed by add_user_call()
> 
> aah I see, uhmmmmm ok I will change add_user to set both and push the
> patch, ok?
> 
> Simo.
> 

Ack

- --
Stephen Gallagher
RHCE 804006346421761

Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkm2t0sACgkQeiVVYja6o6O//QCeOKlFKu4YFU64mRMaNuPJqjkf
40AAn3B2mDWBHSeKMXtDRhKbTvyrqdwo
=F8K9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the Freeipa-devel mailing list