[Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 763 use full name for gecos
Sumit Bose
sbose at redhat.com
Mon Apr 4 14:41:00 UTC 2011
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 10:01:29AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 04/04/2011 09:58 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On 04/01/2011 06:14 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
> >> On 04/01/2011 02:17 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> >>> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >>>> Hash: SHA1
> >>>>
> >>>> On 04/01/2011 03:55 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
> >>>>> Use fullname for gecos instead of uid.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ticket 1146
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> While it probably doesn't actually matter for these tests, I should note
> >>>> that the GECOS attribute in LDAP is IA5String, not UTF8.
> >>>>
> >>>> Otherwise, Ack.
> >>>
> >>> It is defined using Directory String syntax by 389-ds. According to
> >>> rfc 2307 it should be an IA5String, not sure why it isn't but we
> >>> inherit this schema.
> >> It is defined in the original rfc 2307 as Directory String, but 2307bis
> >> redefined it to IA5String.
> >
> >
> > Actually, I just looked at both RFC 2307 and RFC 2307bis. It's defined
> > as IA5String in both.
> >
> > From http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2307.txt:
> > 3. Attribute definitions
> >
> > This section contains attribute definitions to be implemented by DUAs
> > supporting this schema.
> > ...
> > ( nisSchema.1.2 NAME 'gecos'
> > DESC 'The GECOS field; the common name'
> > EQUALITY caseIgnoreIA5Match
> > SUBSTRINGS caseIgnoreIA5SubstringsMatch
> > SYNTAX 'IA5String' SINGLE-VALUE )
> >
> >
> > And from http://www.padl.com/~lukeh/rfc2307bis.txt
> > 3. Attribute definitions
> >
> > This section contains attribute definitions to be implemented by
> > DUAs supporting this schema.
> > ...
> > ( 1.3.6.1.1.1.1.2 NAME 'gecos'
> > DESC 'The GECOS field; the common name'
> > EQUALITY caseIgnoreIA5Match
> > SUBSTRINGS caseIgnoreIA5SubstringsMatch
> > SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.26
> > SINGLE-VALUE )
> >
>
>
> Hmm, strange. http://bgp.potaroo.net/ietf/idref/draft-howard-rfc2307bis/
> defines it as DirectoryString.
>
> So I have no idea which one is "more correct" for RFC 2307bis.
Look at the diffs in
http://bgp.potaroo.net/ietf/idref/draft-howard-rfc2307bis/
There are currently -00, -01 and -02 of the draft.
bye,
Sumit
>
>
> - --
> Stephen Gallagher
> RHCE 804006346421761
>
> Delivering value year after year.
> Red Hat ranks #1 in value among software vendors.
> http://www.redhat.com/promo/vendor/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAk2ZzzkACgkQeiVVYja6o6NEzQCeN9LxMNSd05Kqj6NHhRxOfXAw
> wsUAmwVplkWHnsLN/z2DY0RSJL+mbNMZ
> =gI9S
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeipa-devel mailing list
> Freeipa-devel at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
More information about the Freeipa-devel
mailing list