[Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 0066 Arrange stripping .po files
John Dennis
jdennis at redhat.com
Mon Jul 23 23:12:40 UTC 2012
On 07/23/2012 06:27 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> As a translator (for another project), I don't like Transifex and prefer
> to send good old Git pull requests. I understand a "traditional"
> workflow is hard to coordinate with others that use Transifex, but still
> I'd hate it if we became dependent on Tx.
For better or worse we are dependent on TX (Transifex). Fedora has
adopted TX as it's translation tool, RHEL's translation tools integrate
with TX (as well as other translation portals). And SSSD and IPA have
made a a commitment to TX based on the direction of Fedora and RHEL.
Given that we've adopted TX I don't see the value in maintaining tools
that support both TX and non-TX workflows. I'd rather see us delete the
non-TX elements. If we have just one workflow it's easier to understand
and maintain the code. If we ever decide we need to go back to a non-TX
workflow we can always retrieve the deleted code from git.
--
John Dennis <jdennis at redhat.com>
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
More information about the Freeipa-devel
mailing list