[Freeipa-devel] FreeIPA server package group

[Petr Viktorin]

On 08/28/2013 12:20 PM, Tomas Babej wrote:
> On 08/28/2013 12:03 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
>> On 08/28/2013 11:46 AM, Tomas Babej wrote:
>>> On 08/26/2013 10:14 AM, Tomas Babej wrote:
>>>> On Mon 26 Aug 2013 10:12:09 AM CEST, Petr Vobornik wrote:
>>>>> On 08/26/2013 09:54 AM, Tomas Babej wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I cooked up a patch for comps that adds a FreeIPA package group.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please chime in if you're OK with package selection / description.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For illustration, see the attached image. FreeIPA will be added as an
>>>>>> add-on in an installer under the Infrastructure server environment,
>>>>>> that means, in the included images it will be at the same level
>>>>>> as DNS or FTP server.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It will also appear in the Software Selection tool (PackageKit).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It should also be available under as yum groupinstall "FreeIPA
>>>>>> server",
>>>>>> and in PackageKit, as I understand comps is also source for that too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_use_and_edit_comps.xml_for_package_groups
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3630
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> IMO the Audit part in the description is false advertisement. Same
>>>>> issue is in package descriptions.
>>>>
>>>> I know, it's taken directly from there.
>>>>
>>>> I'd rather have it consistent, if we're going to change it here, we
>>>> should do
>>>> there too, so that we do not end up with multiple (seemingly
>>>> incomplete)
>>>> descriptions at various places.
>>>
>>> Anybody else does have any other concerns? We need to move with this
>>> effort since string freeze for F20 is coming.
>>>
>>> I'm particulary dubious about including the freeipa-tests package.
>>
>> I don't think that should be included, developer tests are unnecessary
>> for a server.
>>
> It was marked as optional in the initial proposal, but I agree it's
> unnecessary for
> it to be there at all.
>>> We discussed the A (as Audit) part in the description with Rob. The
>>> fact is
>>> that this is taken from the freeipa-server package description and
>>> nobody
>>> complained in 7 years.
>>
>
> Updated tests attached.
>

Oh, one more thing I remembered just now -- is it too late?
We should include bind-dyndb-ldap (which pulls in bind). Preferably as 
default.

-- 
Petr³