[Freeipa-devel] [PATCH][DOC] 432 Add direct bug reporting links to Feedback section

[Petr Spacek]

On 13.2.2014 22:39, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 13.2.2014 14:33, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 11/08/2013 10:18 AM, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> On 10/17/2013 12:04 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>>> On 10/17/2013 07:25 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>>>>> On 17.10.2013 03:06, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 2013-10-16 at 21:59 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
>>>>>>> On 16.10.2013 15:31, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>>>>>>> This change should enable faster and easier filing of new bugs. Patch
>>>>>>>> also simplifies the section for both redhat and fedora variants.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3754
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hmm, is there a way to add the "Report a bug" link to each page footer (in
>>>>>>> HTML output)? I think that people should see this option all the time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This recalls me another thing:
>>>>>>> Could we add TICKET_CREATE privilege to anonymous 'subject' in the
>>>>>>> Trac? This
>>>>>>> should allow anyone to create ticket even without registration/logging in,
>>>>>>> which lowers the barrier.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bad idea, you'll soon be submerge by the worst looking spam, seriously,
>>>>>> don't do it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Besides you wouldn't be able to notify the reporter that you need more
>>>>>> info and so on, its not worth to have fire-and-forget reports.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is an input box for reporter's e-mail...
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, I wonder who would fill it. I would personally leave it as is, when
>>>> someone really does not not want to register to Fedora, he can send a mail to
>>>> freeipa-users (and thus also give as a way to ask back).
>>>>
>>>> Martin
>>>
>>> I hope that this question was resolved. As for "Report a bug" link on each
>>> page
>>> footer, I am not sure if Publican can do that and I am also not sure if it
>>> would not be disturbing.
>>>
>>> I would rather like to let us review the requested change and provided patch.
>>> IMO the provided Trac/Bugzilla links makes the bug filing easier, which was
>>> the
>>> point of the ticket - please review.
>>>
>>> Let us review the change and continue with other doc improvements, there is a
>>> lot of those on our plate in this area.
>>>
>>> Martin
>>
>> This patch is stale - the doc patch is on the list, ready and waiting.
>>
>> Petr, if it is ok with you, let's ack&push it, if not and you have reasonable
>> other proposal, let's do it. If you think the ticket does not make sense, let's
>> close it. I just want to see some action and avoid having 4 months long thread
>> for a minor improvement ticket.
>
> Sure, this have fallen through cracks.

ACK

-- 
Petr^2 Spacek