[Freeipa-devel] [PATCH 0083] Add DNSSEC experimental support warning message

Petr Spacek pspacek at redhat.com
Wed Jul 2 13:21:01 UTC 2014


On 2.7.2014 14:57, Martin Basti wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-07-01 at 12:23 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 1.7.2014 12:20, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> On 07/01/2014 10:55 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>>>> On 1.7.2014 10:49, Petr Viktorin wrote:
>>>>> On 07/01/2014 10:43 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>>>>>> On 30.6.2014 17:10, Martin Basti wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 16:57 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 30.6.2014 14:33, Martin Basti wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 12:49 +0200, Martin Basti wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Patch attached.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It works for me.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please change the string little bit, I have realized that we should
>>>>>>>> ensure
>>>>>>>> that file permissions are correct:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> chown named: *
>>>>>>>> chmod u= *
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> (the chmod part new)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Updated patch attached
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm really sorry, I had to change the message once again :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> None of us noticed that chmod command was completely incorrect. I'm
>>>>>> attaching fixed patch as an apology.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It works for me when applied to master
>>>>>> (50c30c8401c21d43414404bd5caa157196449e4c).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Functional self-ACK :-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> IMHO it can be pushed if Python-review is okay.
>>>>>
>>>>> Once again, please define new message classes in messages.py instead of just
>>>>> using PublicMessage with a custom string.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, these messages will work for console output, but I'm not sure
>>>>> pre-wrapped text would look good in web UI.
>>>>> I'm not sold on the idea of giving instructions in warning messages. Would a
>>>>> link to some documentation be better?
>>>>
>>>> Well, the idea was to provide copy&paste instructions directly in the console,
>>>> not speaking about problems with URLs downstream.
>>>>
>>>> If you insist on URL ... here it is:
>>>> http://www.freeipa.org/page/Releases/4.0.0#Experimental_DNSSEC_Support
>>>>
>>>
>>> Please use something more stable, like
>>>
>>> http://www.freeipa.org/page/DNSSEC
>>>
>>> which we would use as a gathering place for information about FreeIPA and DNSSEC.
>>
>> IMHO this particular warning should point to version-specific information.
>>
>> I'm not opposing to /page/DNSSEC idea in general but this warning should point
>> to very specific steps which will be valid only to very specific version of
>> FreeIPA.
>>
>
> Updated patch attached

I have bad news for you: Patch
freeipa-mbasti-0083-4-DNSSEC-experimental-support-warning-message.patch

cannot be applied on top of:

current master (01b95805ab1428e10c79abf70c9bc9e2baf9de21)
freeipa-mbasti-0080-Allow-to-add-non-string-values-to-named-conf.patch
freeipa-mbasti-0081-DNSSEC-Add-experimental-support-for-DNSSEC.patch
freeipa-mbasti-0082-Add-warning-about-semantic-change-for-zones.patch

-- 
Petr^2 Spacek




More information about the Freeipa-devel mailing list