[Freeipa-devel] [PATCH]Extending user plugin with employeenumber field
Misnyovszki Adam
amisnyov at redhat.com
Thu Mar 27 15:56:03 UTC 2014
On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 14:07:50 +0100
Misnyovszki Adam <amisnyov at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 18:26:53 +0100
> Misnyovszki Adam <amisnyov at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 14:31:15 +0100
> > Petr Vobornik <pvoborni at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 21.3.2014 11:00, Misnyovszki Adam wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 21 Mar 2014 10:13:55 +0100
> > > > Misnyovszki Adam <amisnyov at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:06:27 +0100
> > > >> Petr Vobornik <pvoborni at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> On 21.2.2014 15:45, Adam Misnyovszki wrote:
> > > >>>> Hi,
> > > >>>> According to http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2798 ipa client
> > > >>>> and web ui extended with employeenumber field.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4165
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Question is, that should we extend user with other fields
> > > >>>> which are in the RFC, (carLicense, departmentNumber,
> > > >>>> employeeType, etc) if we already touched this code?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thanks
> > > >>>> Adam
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> + Int('employeenumber?',
> > > >>> + label=_('Employee ID'),
> > > >>> + minvalue=1,
> > > >>> + ),
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Why Int and different label? IMO it should be Str and
> > > >>> 'Employee Number'
> > > >>>
> > > >>> 2.4. Employee Number
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Numeric or alphanumeric identifier assigned to a person,
> > > >>> typically based on order of hire or association with an
> > > >>> organization. Single valued.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> ( 2.16.840.1.113730.3.1.3
> > > >>> NAME 'employeeNumber'
> > > >>> DESC 'numerically identifies an employee within an
> > > >>> organization' EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
> > > >>> SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
> > > >>> SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15
> > > >>> SINGLE-VALUE )
> > > >>>
> > > >> Hi,
> > > >> fixed, also some other fields added. Note, that according to
> > > >> the rfc,
> > >
> > > >> licence plate field should be multivalue, should I cange
> > > >> that(it is an existing field).
> > >
> > > yes
> > >
> > >
> > > >> Also, should I write test cases(especially for
> > > >> preferredlanguage)?
> > >
> > > Testing new functionality helps.
> > >
> > > >> Greets
> > > >> Adam
> > > >
> > > > self NACK,
> > > > VERSION bump because API change
> > >
> > > It requires another rebase.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Greets
> > > > Adam
> > > >
> > >
> > > 1) Is there a reason to have label 'Employee ID' instead of
> > > 'Employee Number' which is in RFC 2798?
> > >
> > > + label=_('Employee ID'),
> > >
> > >
> > > 2) Department number seems to be multivalued as well:
> > > ( 2.16.840.1.113730.3.1.2
> > > NAME 'departmentNumber'
> > > DESC 'identifies a department within an organization'
> > > EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch
> > > SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch
> > > SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15 )
> > >
> > > 3) The regex for preferredlanguage:
> > >
> > > + pattern='^[a-zA-Z]{1,8}[-[a-zA-Z]{1,8}]?$',
> > >
> > > doesn't match the expression in RFC 2068. It's only part of it.
> > >
> > >
> > > Accept-Language = "Accept-Language" ":"
> > > 1#( language-range [ ";" "q" "="
> > > qvalue ] )
> > >
> > > language-range = ( ( 1*8ALPHA *( "-" 1*8ALPHA ) ) |
> > > "*" )
> > >
> > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2068#section-14.4
> > >
> > > RFC 2798 ( http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2798#section-2.7 ) says
> > > that you should omit only the `"Accept-Language" ":"` sequence.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > See the updates in the attached patch.
> > Greets
> > Adam
>
> The preferredLanguage regex pattern and error message has been
> modified to comply with RFC, according to conversation with Petr.
> Thanks
> Adam
>
The regex pattern corrected, unit tests added for preferredlanguage.
Greets
Adam
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: freeipa-amisnyov-0005-6-Extending-user-plugin-with-inetOrgPerson-fields.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 17126 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-devel/attachments/20140327/8b1a1bc8/attachment.bin>
More information about the Freeipa-devel
mailing list