[Freeipa-devel] [PATCH 0002] Port from python-krbV to python-gssapi

Michael Šimáček msimacek at redhat.com
Tue Aug 25 10:46:46 UTC 2015



On 2015-08-25 12:38, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015, Michael Šimáček wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2015-08-24 20:29, Robbie Harwood wrote:
>>> Michael Šimáček <msimacek at redhat.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> On 2015-08-24 17:49, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 2015-08-24 at 17:18 +0200, Michael Šimáček wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2015-08-24 14:50, Jan Cholasta wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 23.8.2015 23:27, Michael Šimáček wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 3) ipa-adtrust-install fails with:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> admin password:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unrecognized error during check of admin rights:
>>>>>>> admin at abc.idm.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com: user not found
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Apparently there is a "user-show
>>>>>>> admin at abc.idm.lab.eng.brq.redhat.com"
>>>>>>> call where a "user-show admin" call should be.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fixed. python-gssapi has a display_as method that could pull the name
>>>>>> from it, but it doesn't work in current version, therefore using
>>>>>> partition to split on '@'
>>>
>>> It's actually a bug in MIT Krb5, as we noted in your bug[0].  So this:
>>>
>>>> -        user = api.Command.user_show(unicode(principal[0]))['result']
>>>> +        user =
>>>> api.Command.user_show(principal.partition('@')[0])['result']
>>>
>>> is working around a bug in specific Kerberos versions.  If people are
>>> okay with merging such code, then I guess this is fine; I would
>>> personally not do so because there is not a clear point at which it can
>>> be removed.  At the very least, we should wait until we see what
>>> versions of krb5 MIT is going to fix.
>>>
>>> Otherwise, looks good.
>>>
>>> [0]: https://github.com/pythongssapi/python-gssapi/issues/79
>>>
>>
>> python-krbV migration is blocking support for Python 3. The bug
>> doesn't have any fix upstream yet and there are two bugs actually, the
>> second one is in python-gssapi, which I've just reported [1]. Waiting
>> for two bugs to be fixed could be detrimental to py3 migration as we
>> don't have much time left. And I'm no longer sure that display_as
> I don't buy this.
>
> We have plenty of time for solving these bugs. Remember, that Samba
> DCE RPC bindings aren't migrated to Python 3 either and will not be
> before release of Samba 4.4. For Samba 4.3 it is simply too late.
>
> So we are still far away from full Python3 migration for FreeIPA and
> waiting for solving these two bugs is OK.
>

If fixing them solves anything at all. I planned to use 
display_as(NameType.user), but when trying it on Name object with 
name_type set (which doesn't trigger the segfault), it doesn't seem to 
work either. I get:
gssapi.raw.exceptions.OperationUnavailableError: Major (1048576): The 
operation or option is not available or unsupported, Minor (0): Unknown 
error

Robbie, can you clarify whether display_as could be actually used to get 
the first component of the principal reliably?

>> could be used at all, as I'm getting "operation not supported" on
>> inputs that don't trigger any of the bugs. I don't think parsing a
>> string is a big problem. When there will be a different solution
>> available, I'll submit a new patch. I'm tracking python-gssapi's
>> issues on github and I won't dissapear after this is merged.
> Sure. It is not about you disappearing any time soon, we need to solve
> migration issues properly rather than hurrying up for whatever reasons.
>




More information about the Freeipa-devel mailing list