[Freeipa-devel] ipa-devel repos on jdennis.fedorapeople.org

[Nathaniel McCallum]

On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 10:27 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 15.7.2015 09:44, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:49:23PM -0400, John Dennis wrote:
> > > On 07/14/2015 12:03 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > > 
> > > > Is anyone using repos
> > > > https://jdennis.fedorapeople.org/ipa-devel/
> > > > ?
> > > > 
> > > > AFAIK nobody in Brno is seriously using it but I'm not sure
> > > > about people
> > > > outside the Brno.
> > > > 
> > > > Could we use COPR instead and get out of builder business?
> > > > Upcoming lab
> > > > maintenance window could be a good time to do that.
> > > 
> > > I would love to get out of the builder business and I suspect
> > > Nalin would as
> > > well [1]. The question came up in our Monday meeting as well.
> > > Nobody seem to
> > > know if anyone was using these builds and why we weren't using
> > > COPR. The
> > 
> > The Fedora infra admins should be able to provide HTTP logs for the
> > repo, if you needs some numbers about potential usage.
> 
> That is a good idea! I got logs from Fedora admins and as far as I
> can tell,
> in the last month there were only 7 RPM downloads and nothing else.
> 
> The 7 hits I found was for
> /ipa-devel/rhel/6/x86_64/os/sssd-1.13.1-
> 0.20150813T1121Zgit137d5dd.el6.i686.rpm and
> other packages from the same version.
> 
> I did not find any hits for IPA packages at all. All the remaining
> traffic
> (except the 7 RPM hits) was from repo data refreshes:
> - 83 % is RHEL 5 repodata
> - 13 % is RHEL 6 repodata
> - remaining ~ 4 % of noise is Fedora repodata
> 
> It seems to me that we can get out the builder business completely
> and
> decommission ipa-devel and replace it with COPR.
> 
> Do you agree? John? Nathaniel? Stephen? Anyone? :-)

I'm not using it. Let's kill it. :)