[Freeipa-devel] ipa-devel repos on jdennis.fedorapeople.org

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Thu, 2015-08-27 at 08:20 -0400, John Dennis wrote:
> On 08/27/2015 04:27 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> > On 15.7.2015 09:44, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 12:49:23PM -0400, John Dennis wrote:
> > > > On 07/14/2015 12:03 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Is anyone using repos
> > > > > https://jdennis.fedorapeople.org/ipa-devel/
> > > > > ?
> > > > > 
> > > > > AFAIK nobody in Brno is seriously using it but I'm not sure
> > > > > about people
> > > > > outside the Brno.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Could we use COPR instead and get out of builder business?
> > > > > Upcoming lab
> > > > > maintenance window could be a good time to do that.
> > > > 
> > > > I would love to get out of the builder business and I suspect
> > > > Nalin would as
> > > > well [1]. The question came up in our Monday meeting as well.
> > > > Nobody seem to
> > > > know if anyone was using these builds and why we weren't using
> > > > COPR. The
> > > 
> > > The Fedora infra admins should be able to provide HTTP logs for
> > > the
> > > repo, if you needs some numbers about potential usage.
> > 
> > That is a good idea! I got logs from Fedora admins and as far as I
> > can tell,
> > in the last month there were only 7 RPM downloads and nothing else.
> > 
> > The 7 hits I found was for
> > /ipa-devel/rhel/6/x86_64/os/sssd-1.13.1-
> > 0.20150813T1121Zgit137d5dd.el6.i686.rpm and
> > other packages from the same version.
> > 
> > I did not find any hits for IPA packages at all. All the remaining
> > traffic
> > (except the 7 RPM hits) was from repo data refreshes:
> > - 83 % is RHEL 5 repodata
> > - 13 % is RHEL 6 repodata
> > - remaining ~ 4 % of noise is Fedora repodata
> > 
> > It seems to me that we can get out the builder business completely
> > and
> > decommission ipa-devel and replace it with COPR.
> > 
> > Do you agree? John? Nathaniel? Stephen? Anyone? :-)
> 
> Yes, I agree. Do we have a cut off date when I can stop the service?
> 


Given that the traffic was so small, it looks likely that only a
single person is still using it. Probably safe to just kill it off and
wait for that person to ask where to go.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-devel/attachments/20150831/0e08956d/attachment.sig>