[Freeipa-devel] [PATCHSET] Replica promotion patches

[Oleg Fayans]

Hi Simo,

I was able to build the packages based on your git repo. However, my 
attempt to install the resulting bits failed due to lack of dependencies:

pki-ca >= 10.2.7 is needed by 
freeipa-server-4.2.90.201510010815GITb726fa9-0.fc22.x86_64
pki-kra >= 10.2.7 is needed by 
freeipa-server-4.2.90.201510010815GITb726fa9-0.fc22.x86_64

My system has version 10.2.6 of above packages provided by 
mkosek/freeipa-master copr repo.

What is the correct repo to get 10.2.7 from?

On 09/29/2015 09:31 PM Simo Sorce wrote:
> On 29/09/15 14:56, Oleg Fayans wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/29/2015 06:47 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>> On 29/09/15 11:50, Oleg Fayans wrote:
>>>> Hi Simo,
>>>>
>>>> It seems to have resolved the initial issue, but now the build fails
>>>> due
>>>> to lint complaints: https://paste.fedoraproject.org/272714/54174014/
>>>
>>> These happens if you do not have custodia installed.
>>> I guess I should make it also a BuildRequires ?
>>
>> I think so, yes.
>
> Turns out it is already there.
>
> Simo.
>
>>> Simo.
>>>
>>>> On 09/29/2015 04:54 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>>>> On 29/09/15 10:39, Oleg Fayans wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Simo,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is this [1] the correct link to the repo containing all latest
>>>>>> replica-promotion patches? I tried to build the packages from this
>>>>>> code
>>>>>> and the build failed due to libpdb not having make_pdb_method [2]
>>>>>> I was able to successfully build from the clean upstream tree on the
>>>>>> same machine.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I rebased it on top of current master, let me know if this helps.
>>>>>
>>>>> Simo.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>> https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/simo/public_git/freeipa.git/log/?h=custodia-review
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [2] https://paste.fedoraproject.org/272672/53685114/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 09/29/2015 03:55 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>>>>>> On 29/09/15 09:28, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 09:10:30AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think the problem is that the patch was pushed prematurely.
>>>>>>>>> The option should become unused once the other patches in this
>>>>>>>>> patchset are
>>>>>>>>> applied, that is why that patch was not on top of the list but
>>>>>>>>> rather
>>>>>>>>> down
>>>>>>>>> close to the bottom.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Simo,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> could you please add the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>     How To Test
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> steps to http://www.freeipa.org/page/V4/Replica_Promotion?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It would make the functional check of this patchset easier,
>>>>>>>> spelling
>>>>>>>> out how the workflow is supposed to work.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Done.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> HTH,
>>>>>>> Simo.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>

-- 
Oleg Fayans
Quality Engineer
FreeIPA team
RedHat.