[Freeipa-devel] [PATH 0053] Inconsistency between ipasearchrecordslimit and --sizelimit

[Gabe Alford]

Sounds good to me. Updated patch attached.

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 1:34 AM, Petr Spacek <pspacek at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 14.9.2015 07:23, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> > IMO it does, because saying just "-1 is default" is not entirely correct
> and
> > "0 is default" would be confusing, as you pointed out. You might say "0
> or -1
> > is unlimited" if you think it's clearer.
>
> my +1 to "0 or -1 is unlimited" variant
>
> Petr^2 Spacek
>
>
> > On 10.9.2015 18:39, Gabe Alford wrote:
> >> Oops.. replied without the list.
> >>
> >> Reason I said -1 is because users might be confused if they enter `ipa
> >> config-mod --searchtimelimit=0`, and both `ipa user-show` and the webui
> >> show -1 instead of 0. I wonder if -1 makes more sense in that regard?
> >> Thoughts? Does "<= 0 is unlimited" make more sense?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Gabe
>
> --
> Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
> Contribute to FreeIPA: http://www.freeipa.org/page/Contribute/Code
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-devel/attachments/20150914/81b88d1c/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: freeipa-rga-0053-7-Standardize-minvalue-for-ipasearchrecordlimit-and.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 8247 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-devel/attachments/20150914/81b88d1c/attachment.bin>